My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 012815
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
PC 012815
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:43:04 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:25:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/28/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ms. Amos said yes. <br />Commissioner Balch referred to the fee process for dogs, using it as an example since <br />one of the speakers brought it up earlier. He clarified that dog licensing is an annual, <br />bi- annual or tri- annual process, and the City of Pleasanton could basically have an <br />estimate of the number of dogs, assuming everyone complies with the law, and hence a <br />second dog park can be justified. He inquired if staff thought of that and determined <br />that a similar element might not be needed with the bees. <br />Ms. Amos replied that was correct. <br />Acting Chair Ritter stated that he would almost like to see just a notice, without a fee, <br />every time the queen bee is replaced; in this way, staff knows that it is an active hive as <br />opposed to giving a permit and then staff never hears about it unless a neighbor calls. <br />Commissioner Balch stated that his initial thought was that if the beekeeper has to pay <br />$150 for a valid permit for two years and had to pay another $10 after two years to <br />renew the permit, the beekeeper would not renew the permit if the hive had gone <br />dormant. He indicated that the City does not have a method to know how many active <br />hives there are. <br />Acting Chair Ritter inquired if the permit is for two years. <br />Ms. Amos replied that the permit stays with the beekeepers for as long as they have the <br />hives. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that he thinks this needs to be kept simple. He <br />indicated that he has known beekeepers and has had good friends who are <br />beekeepers, one of whom had a small lot of about 3,000 to 4,000 square feet and about <br />five hives and no complaints. He noted that he stands next to the hives and sees the <br />bees come up and fly away without bothering him. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that he believes there are more beehives in Pleasanton, <br />and staff does not know any of them because they have not been processed and there <br />have been no complaints. He indicated that he thinks it is a positive that there are bees <br />here. He reiterated that he wants to keep it simple and would like to discuss having <br />some flexibility. He added that he does not want to set fees for the City, but he does not <br />want this to be the same as a Conditional Use Permit fee as it sounds awfully high. He <br />noted that staff will go out and inspect the first time, but up until now, nobody has <br />inspected anything and there have been almost zero complaints. He indicated that he <br />certainly does not want to deter anybody from starting a beehive. <br />Commissioner Balch stated that he thinks the element of a high barrier to entry is <br />already present by the fact that the beekeeper needs to buy the hive and the queen. He <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 28, 2015 Page 11 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.