My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 012815
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
PC 012815
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:43:04 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:25:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/28/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
indicated that he finds the fee to be slightly on the outrageous side but understands <br />what staff is doing, which is more than what they are doing for dog licensing. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that his friend did not buy bees; he took bees that were <br />swarming elsewhere and out of trees, houses, and eaves and brought them home. He <br />indicated that does not want to make this difficult and added that he was not quite sure <br />when why staff wanted to track whether it all worked since there have not been any <br />complaints. He indicated, however, that it is fine that the City wants to know where all <br />the beehives are or to make sure that they are set up right, but he would like to make it <br />cost - effective. <br />Commissioner Balch stated that this is why making the queen change was something <br />he was not keen on. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that beekeepers who know what they are doing will <br />change their queen out when it is time; otherwise, they will not be productive. <br />Acting Chair Ritter noted that the Commissioners are all in favor of this but it is the price <br />that they are not quite in favor of. <br />Commissioner O'Connor reiterated that he would like to keep it simple and really does <br />not like limiting it to only two hives for those who have a larger lot. He indicated that <br />there ought to be some mechanism to give the City some flexibility, for example, taking <br />them on a case -by -case basis, especially for big lots and since a huge flood of <br />applicants coming in is not expected. <br />Commissioner Balch apologized that he might have diverted the Commission a bit <br />more. He indicated that in terms of the whole thing, he is very supportive of moving <br />forward as a City. He add that there are a few things he wanted clarified as mentioned <br />earlier, such as the height of the stack versus the entire height of the structure, and how <br />they are to be measured. <br />Acting Chair Ritter indicated that the maximum height is four feet. <br />Commissioner Balch stated that he actually does not agree with the four feet maximum <br />and asked what the height of three of those boxes and a reasonable stand would be. <br />He questioned what a reasonable height for hives is and indicated that he is not <br />qualified to say. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that he has seen them as 18 inches. <br />Commissioner Balch stated that he might say the total height cannot exceed six feet or <br />maybe eight feet because he is thinking of a residential fence. <br />Ms. Amos stated that something to keep in mind with respect to the discussion about <br />measurements and height requirements is that the Building and Safety Division Code <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 28, 2015 Page 12 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.