My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 012815
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
PC 012815
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:43:04 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:25:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/28/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ms. Amos replied that it would cost 25 percent of the fee, with a maximum of $25. She <br />then explained how the process works: Staff sends out the notification cards; if an <br />interested party comes in with concerns, staff evaluates those concerns to determine if <br />something cannot be worked out between the two parties, the complainant could <br />request a staff -level Zoning Administrator hearing, at which time the Zoning <br />Administrator would issue an action which would either be to approve with conditions or <br />to deny the application. Once an action is taken, an appeal can be filed within a 15 -day <br />period, and the application then goes before the Planning Commission. <br />Commissioner Balch clarified then that an activity that someone is trying to start to <br />establish costs $175 before it even starts. <br />Ms. Amos replied if the beekeeper were the one filing the appeal, it would cost $150 <br />plus the 25 percent appeal fee but no more than $25. She added that an appeal for a <br />sign would be 25 percent of the $15 application fee. <br />Commissioner Balch then referred to the height issue, which is a maximum of four feet <br />from stand to top and not from the ground to the top. <br />Ms. Amos said yes; four feet would be the maximum height of the hive itself. <br />Commissioner Balch referred to the picture of the White House hive, which stands four <br />feet off the ground, and the picture of the hive in the backyard, which appears to be <br />approximately a foot off the ground, and inquired if both those hives would comply with <br />the height regulation. <br />Ms. Amos replied that the White House hive would be in compliance for the boxes <br />themselves, but excluding the stand part of it. She explained that the intent is not to <br />have six boxes stacked on top of one other, but with the provision that they have to be <br />kept off of the ground to prevent dry rot. She added that the White House hive may not <br />comply with the performance standards because the stand could be too high. <br />Commissioner Balch stated that, putting it in reference, most common fences are six <br />feet tall. He inquired if the height is marked down starting at the height of the stand or <br />the height of the dirt. <br />Ms. Harryman interjected that the Commission should let staff know what it wants, and <br />staff will draft the Code amendment around it. She indicated that the intent may be <br />different, but the way she is reading this is that the Code Enforcement Officer goes out, <br />and the maximum height of the hive shall not exceed four feet. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that he reads it the same way because staff wants a <br />six -foot tall barrier behind the hive, and allowing a four -foot tall hive on a four -foot tall <br />stand would put it above the fence line. <br />Acting Chair Ritter clarified that the proposal is for a four -foot tall maximum height. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 28, 2015 Page 10 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.