My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 111214
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 111214
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:24:07 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:21:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/12/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Ritter noted that Chair O'Connor was on the Commission when this <br />matter was first brought up and asked him what his thoughts were before the new <br />Commissioners came on board. <br />Chair O'Connor stated that this issue has been going on for a long time, and trying to <br />work out a compromise has had no success. He indicated that he thinks the <br />Commission should consider agendizing the matter, but he does not know if he has <br />support for that from the other Commissioners. He noted that at the last meeting, <br />Mr. Dolan had offered to sit down with any of the Commissioners for background <br />information on this issue prior to meeting with the Millers. <br />Commissioner Ritter inquired if it can be agendized as a discussion. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that if the Commission is going to vote to put this on the agenda, it <br />should start with a discussion, and the Commission can then decide at that point if there <br />is a direction. <br />Chair O'Connor verified that at the last meeting, Mr. Dolan explained that if a discussion <br />were agendized, both the Millers and the Masons would be notified and invited to <br />attend; staff will prepare a report first that would provide some background information, <br />after which the discussion would be opened to the public. <br />Mr. Dolan confirmed that staff would want to provide background for discussion in a <br />staff report, and there may or may not be recommendations in the staff report. He <br />indicated that staff will probably provide the Commission with some options regarding <br />what the Commission could do with that information. He added that the Millers and the <br />Masons would be invited to the meeting. <br />Chair O'Connor inquired if the staff report for the discussion would contain information <br />that would be the same as the staff report for a review of the Conditional Use Permit, <br />should that be agendized. <br />Ms. Harryman replied that the Commission would have staff's information but would not <br />have the benefit of the Masons and the Millers. <br />Chair O'Connor noted that the Masons and the Millers would be present. <br />Ms. Harryman said yes, but added that staff might not have the opportunity to respond <br />to whatever the Commission is going to hear. <br />Mr. Dolan asked the Commission what the agenda item would be if it is not a <br />discussion. <br />Chair O'Connor replied that if it was not a discussion, then it would be to review the <br />Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and if the Masons are adhering to the Conditions of <br />Approval. <br />Commissioner Allen added that it would be the enforcement of the CUP. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 12, 2014 Page 31 of 35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.