Laserfiche WebLink
Chair O'Connor added that it could be the whole spectrum, including whether the <br />Masons are following the CUP, whether the Commission could entice the Masons to <br />follow the CUP, and whether the Commission should revoke the CUP. He indicated <br />that if staff will have to put together a staff report and provide the information for a <br />discussion, he is not sure what would be new the second time around. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that the likelihood is that whatever happens, the direction would <br />probably head towards a request for an amendment to the CUP, and that will be the <br />action. <br />Chair O'Connor inquired if this would be coming from the discussion as opposed to a <br />review of the CUP. <br />Mr. Dolan explained that this has been part of the dialogue for five years now, and if the <br />determination is made that a compromise is not going to work and there will be some <br />action taken against the Masons, the Masons will immediately file an application to <br />amend the CUP. <br />Commissioner Piper inquired if that application would probably be approved. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that the Commission would be making that decision. <br />Chair O'Connor inquired if that would come to the Commission at the same time that the <br />Commission is reviewing the CUP or after the fact. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that it would make no sense to belabor the issues in the old CUP if <br />there is an application for a new CUP where the rules might change entirely. <br />Chair O'Connor asked Mr. Dolan if he thought the Masons would submit the application <br />before the hearing. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that he is certain of it. <br />Chair O'Connor inquired if the Commission could consider all that at the same time. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that he thinks the Commission needs to start with a discussion and let <br />itself shake itself out. He indicated that he does not think the Commission can tackle it <br />all in one meeting. <br />Chair O'Connor inquired if it would be the same as a Work Session. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that it is just a discussion, and there would be no action: the <br />Commission would get an idea of where it stands, and the Commission would hear from <br />both parties. He indicated that if the Commission seemed to be of a consensus that <br />some enforcement needed to be done, he strongly suspects that would prompt an <br />application for an amendment to the CUP. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 12, 2014 Page 32 of 35 <br />