My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 102214
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 102214
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:23:14 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:18:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/22/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Balch stated that his comment on the landscaping is similar to his <br />comment on the Jeep dealership project. He noted that Building E from the south <br />elevation is a pretty significant -sized building because it is obviously a very lengthy <br />building along the entire southern front, and this is where the park will be looking. He <br />indicated that he really does not like the trash enclosure being tucked up against the <br />park on the southwest corner and suggested that it be a small one if it has to be there. <br />He stated that the building looks massive from the park, and he would like to see a <br />softening -up, and the Willow tree line chosen by Mr. Gates can definitely do that. He <br />added, however, that he would prefer a lower water user, but if the Willow can tolerate <br />recycled water, then he is indifferent because that would be a good solution. <br />In terms of the meandering path or the vineyard area, Commissioner Balch stated that <br />he would personally like to see the sidewalk move off of El Charro Road primarily <br />because of Vulcan Material Company's use of El Charro Road with the heavy trucks. <br />He indicated that he would like the sidewalk to be as far away from El Charro Road as <br />possible and to remove a little bit of the vineyard as well as there would be an <br />18- wheeler going down the road about four feet from the curb. He stated that he <br />prefers not to walk along a sidewalk that would have this much traffic, and obviously not <br />straight up against the building either. He agreed with Commissioner Piper regarding <br />visualizing the vineyard at that location but conceded that it might work well. <br />Commissioner Allen stated that she is neutral on the vineyard and that it fits the design. <br />He agreed with Commissioner Balch about moving the sidewalk in because of the <br />gravel and the dust and using more landscaping to soften Building E. She commented <br />that she assumes there would probably be potted plants or plants in the ground in the <br />patio area with the tables and that it would be a really nice area to have a lot of shade. <br />Chair O'Connor stated that he thinks there is no room for the vineyards and that he <br />wants to get the sidewalk off of El Charro Road. He noted that the applicant mentioned <br />a meandering sidewalk, and he does not know if there is room to get the sidewalk off of <br />El Charro Road and have it meandering, although there will be more room for other <br />landscaping and smaller trees such as Crepe Myrtle on both sides between where the <br />sidewalk meanders. He added that he wanted the selection of trees on Stoneridge <br />Drive to be consistent with the General Plan. <br />E. Does the Planning Commission have any comments on the proposed permitted <br />and conditionally permitted uses? <br />Commissioner Piper stated that she has no comments and that they all seem pretty <br />good to her. <br />Commissioner Balch stated that, going back to the topic on trees, he has family <br />members that have allergies so he would like to minimize trees or plants that produce <br />pollen or to choose varieties with a lower pollen. In terms of the uses, he pointed out <br />the list of Permitted Uses /Retail on page 3 of Exhibit B, Item 49 states that food will be <br />served until 11:00 p.m., and Item 5 under Conditional Uses /Retail on the same page <br />stated that food will be served until midnight. He added that there is also the question <br />about food and alcohol or alcoholic beverages served with food service. He indicated <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, October 22, 2014 Page 25 of 30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.