My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 082714
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 082714
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:20:55 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:17:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/27/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Weinstein apologized for the errors on the chart and stated that staff will go back to <br />review and then correct the numbers. <br />Commissioner Balch stated that the data source is from the Lieutenant's report <br />Commissioner Allen noted that there is no crime data for a 7- Eleven store that includes <br />a gas station. She pointed out that both the store and the gas station should be <br />considered for crime data at the proposed location. <br />Mr. Weinstein agreed. He stated that crime is something staff spends a lot of time on, <br />collaborating with the Police Department and looking and analyzing these this data. He <br />indicated that Ms. Soo and he met with Lt. Bretzing, who provided this initial data, and <br />Lt. Bretzing made it clear that he does not have any concerns with this proposed use. <br />He added that Lt. Bretzing did call out the fact that he does not have data for a gas <br />station with a 7- Eleven store, but he did not think that was a critical issue in terms of <br />that specific combination of uses generating crime. <br />Commissioner Balch referred to the noise measurements from the summary of <br />long -term noise measurements on Table 2 on page 10 of the noise assessment report <br />and asked staff to verify the 82 dBA reading in the L -max column under weekday. He <br />noted that the noise generated under the existing condition is greater than what the car <br />wash would have generated without the sound wall. He inquired if the noise is louder <br />with or without the sound wall. <br />Mr. Weinstein replied that the L -max reading is the highest volume of noise that was <br />identified during that monitoring period when the noise consultants actually went out to <br />this area and took noise measurements. He noted that 82 dBA may have been an <br />ambulance driving down the street or something really loud happening. He added that <br />that maximum is well in excess of the maximum noise that would be generated by the <br />car wash with the noise barrier. <br />Commissioner Balch inquired if the LDN, which is kind of the mean or median, would be <br />a more appropriate measure. <br />Mr. Weinstein stated that those are the day and night average levels. He added that <br />that would be the reading one would get if noise were averaged over the course of the <br />day. <br />Commissioner Balch requested confirmation that the noise from the car wash would go <br />down to 68 dBA or 69 dBA with the sound barrier. <br />Mr. Weinstein said yes. <br />Commissioner Allen noted that questions and concerns were received from residents <br />regarding the noise that might be generated in their homes from the car wash. She <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 27, 2014 Page 9 of 44 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.