My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 082714
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 082714
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:20:55 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:17:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/27/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
asked Mr. Weinstein if the noise analysis would show that the residents would hear the <br />car wash at 9:55 p.m. on a hot summer day if their windows were open. <br />Mr. Weinstein noted that 9:55 p.m. would be a really quiet time of the day, and not much <br />goes on during Sunday evenings. He stated that the noise study would include data for <br />the worst case scenario of ambient noise levels versus the maximum noise level that <br />the project could generate. He indicated that the consultants went out and gathered <br />empirical data regarding noise in this area, and what they found was that the existing <br />minimum noise level during weekend nights was about 45 dBA, which is fairly low. He <br />continued that the maximum noise level generated by the car wash at the nearest <br />homes to the west across Santa Rita Road would be something like 45 dBA related to <br />the car wash, which would not exceed the lowest noise values that exist on a Sunday <br />night while nothing else is going on. He stated that based on that data, staff believes <br />that the car wash would not generate perceptible noise at the nearest residences to the <br />project site. <br />Commissioner Allen referred to Ms. Soo's statement that there were petitions on both <br />sides and noted that the petition submitted by the applicant was presented to customers <br />of the Valero gas station stating that they support the proposal to convert the existing <br />service bays to a 1,627- square -foot food store and drive -thru car wash. She further <br />noted that nowhere in any of those petitions did she see anything about the request for <br />the addition of alcohol sales or that this is a 7- Eleven store. She pointed out that when <br />people signed this petition, they were not signing something supporting alcohol or a <br />generic 7- Eleven store; they were supporting a generic food store and a car wash. He <br />asked staff if she was reading the petitions correctly. <br />Ms. Soo said yes. She added that she visited the site, and there is a big banner posted <br />on the building showing the renderings of a future store. She indicated that those <br />customers who signed the petition would have seen that banner because it is very <br />large. <br />Commissioner Allen asked if the banner said anything about alcohol sales <br />Mr. Soo replied that it did not. <br />Commissioner Piper stated that the petition did say it would be open 24 hours. <br />Commissioner Allen stated that the petition presented at the Planning Commission <br />Work Session did not say 24 hours. <br />Ms. Soo explained that the petitions circulated before the Work Session stated that it <br />was a 24 -hour operation, which was what the applicants were originally proposing then. <br />Commissioner Allen inquired if this was at the neighborhood meeting with 10 people or <br />so in attendance. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 27, 2014 Page 10 of 44 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.