My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 062514
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 062514
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:16:41 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:12:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/25/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Growth Management goal is to establish the number of units the City wants to build <br />each year. She added that there are allowances to roll over units that are not used or to <br />borrow from other years. <br />Mr. Dolan added that this is a completely local ordinance and that the State has nothing <br />to do with it. <br />Commissioner Balch commented that this is how the City manages its growth. <br />Ms. Wallis said yes, that it is the Growth Management Program adopted by the City. <br />Commissioner Balch noted that one of the speakers did comment about the number of <br />units currently entitled and asked staff to indicate what those count towards in the total <br />numbers. <br />Ms. Wallis displayed a slide showing the total sites in the City's RHNA numbers, broken <br />down by permitted and approved sites. She indicated that the City currently has a total <br />of 1,980 units that are permitted and approved and 1,379 units that are vacant or <br />under - utilized, for a total capacity of 3,359 units. She stated that on pages 72 and 73 of <br />the Housing Element document is an actual physical map of where these units are <br />located within the City. She noted that both the permitted and approved projects and <br />the vacant and under - utilized projects are dispersed pretty equally throughout the entire <br />City. <br />Chair O'Connor inquired if the vacant and under - utilized numbers include anything from <br />the East Pleasanton side. <br />Ms. Wallis said no and added that the City just has a Goal and Policy to continue to <br />explore a variety of housing types within the East Pleasanton Specific Plan area. <br />Mr. Dolan addressed Commissioner Balch saying that he can name the projects if that <br />is what he is looking for. <br />Commissioner Balch said no. He stated that coming in a little bit new, he is trying to <br />understand where the count gets started. He noted that time does not stop, and <br />projects are moving through the pipe, so it appears these have been accounted for in <br />here. He added that it was mentioned at the East Pleasanton Task Force meeting that <br />the City has met its RHNA numbers or looks like it will, and this is where it shows that it <br />has or would. He indicated, however, that he is also hearing that this is just policy and <br />not shovel -ready projects and not being built yet. <br />Ms. Wallis stated that only the St. Anton project has building permits and is under <br />construction at this time, and the BRE project is in the plan -check stage. She added <br />that some of the projects have Development Agreements that extend their entitlement <br />out to ten years from now. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 25, 2014 Page 10 of 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.