Laserfiche WebLink
of the residents to all this growth going on around them. He added that he thinks they <br />just disagree with the assessment that there is a need, particularly those residents who <br />have had the opportunity to look north to Dublin and to see the abundance of housing <br />just over the freeway. <br />Mr. Bowen stated that in 2012, 3,277 units were approved as part of the RHNA <br />projection at that time. He continued that that was reduced in 2014, but 2,168 units of <br />apartment developments were in various stages of the building process or permitting <br />process by then. He added that they were told in 2012, and there was a comment by <br />one of the Councilmembers as well as the City Manager, that they did not anticipate <br />growth actually happening at this pace. He noted that two- thirds of the properties that <br />were approved two years ago now have building plans, and if 2,000 more are added, <br />developers are going to continue to react and pursue those properties, and the City will <br />have a surplus not only of zoned properties but of housing, of which Pleasanton <br />residents are not going to be in favor. He stated that he has gone door to door on these <br />issues, and all the residents he has talked to are hot about this, whether they agree or <br />oppose his perspective. He asked the Commission to not only consider RHNA needs <br />but also the will of the people of Pleasanton who live here, pay taxes here, and vote <br />here. <br />Laura Berkeley agreed with Mr. Bowen's comments. She questioned why the City is <br />overbuilding, putting more housing in Pleasanton than is legally required. She indicated <br />that the City has no water, and the School District has come out in opposition of this as <br />it does not have the capability to build schools. She stated that affordability is really <br />important, and her biggest concern is that the City will continue to take money from <br />developers and the concept of affordable housing will not even exist anyway. She <br />expressed further concern that the City Council is listening to businesses and not to the <br />community itself. <br />Ms. Berkeley agreed with Mr. Bowen that people in this community are very busy. She <br />stated that they all work full time, and they have children in sports. She indicated that <br />the community does not agree with the doubling of Pleasanton. She added that a <br />number of them were out passing out flyers in their community recently, and people <br />were appalled to find out what was going on. She pointed out that traffic there is <br />horrible, and housing is being constructed in properties in the middle of the City where <br />everyone has to get on the road, while the City takes away the property next to BART <br />that could have put people near public transit and listened to Workday's request. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Commissioner Balch stated that he overheard at a different meeting that with respect to <br />RHNA numbers, the City has the ability to borrow from different years. He asked if that <br />was correct. <br />Ms. Wallis replied that the City has a Growth Management Program, and it has <br />2,067 units divided by the eight years of the Housing Element cycle. She stated that the <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 25, 2014 Page 9 of 29 <br />