My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 062514
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 062514
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:16:41 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:12:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/25/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
of the residents to all this growth going on around them. He added that he thinks they <br />just disagree with the assessment that there is a need, particularly those residents who <br />have had the opportunity to look north to Dublin and to see the abundance of housing <br />just over the freeway. <br />Mr. Bowen stated that in 2012, 3,277 units were approved as part of the RHNA <br />projection at that time. He continued that that was reduced in 2014, but 2,168 units of <br />apartment developments were in various stages of the building process or permitting <br />process by then. He added that they were told in 2012, and there was a comment by <br />one of the Councilmembers as well as the City Manager, that they did not anticipate <br />growth actually happening at this pace. He noted that two- thirds of the properties that <br />were approved two years ago now have building plans, and if 2,000 more are added, <br />developers are going to continue to react and pursue those properties, and the City will <br />have a surplus not only of zoned properties but of housing, of which Pleasanton <br />residents are not going to be in favor. He stated that he has gone door to door on these <br />issues, and all the residents he has talked to are hot about this, whether they agree or <br />oppose his perspective. He asked the Commission to not only consider RHNA needs <br />but also the will of the people of Pleasanton who live here, pay taxes here, and vote <br />here. <br />Laura Berkeley agreed with Mr. Bowen's comments. She questioned why the City is <br />overbuilding, putting more housing in Pleasanton than is legally required. She indicated <br />that the City has no water, and the School District has come out in opposition of this as <br />it does not have the capability to build schools. She stated that affordability is really <br />important, and her biggest concern is that the City will continue to take money from <br />developers and the concept of affordable housing will not even exist anyway. She <br />expressed further concern that the City Council is listening to businesses and not to the <br />community itself. <br />Ms. Berkeley agreed with Mr. Bowen that people in this community are very busy. She <br />stated that they all work full time, and they have children in sports. She indicated that <br />the community does not agree with the doubling of Pleasanton. She added that a <br />number of them were out passing out flyers in their community recently, and people <br />were appalled to find out what was going on. She pointed out that traffic there is <br />horrible, and housing is being constructed in properties in the middle of the City where <br />everyone has to get on the road, while the City takes away the property next to BART <br />that could have put people near public transit and listened to Workday's request. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Commissioner Balch stated that he overheard at a different meeting that with respect to <br />RHNA numbers, the City has the ability to borrow from different years. He asked if that <br />was correct. <br />Ms. Wallis replied that the City has a Growth Management Program, and it has <br />2,067 units divided by the eight years of the Housing Element cycle. She stated that the <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 25, 2014 Page 9 of 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.