My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 062514
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 062514
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:16:41 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:12:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/25/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Dolan added that Northgate has submitted, but no one else has. <br />Chair O'Connor asked staff, in response to one of the comments about over - building, if <br />the current RHNA number through 2022 is 2,067 units. <br />Ms. Wallis replied that was correct <br />Chair O'Connor noted that 1,980 of those units have been permitted and approved; that <br />leaves only 87 units. <br />Ms. Wallis explained that it is not just the total number of units and total capacity that <br />should be considered, but also how these units are divided in each of the individual <br />income levels: only 291 of those units are in the extremely -low -, very-low -, and <br />low- income category, and the City is required to have a capacity of 1,107 units. She <br />continued that looking at the permitted unitsis short some 800 units in that area alone. <br />Chair O'Connor asked whose problem is it that the low- or very-low- income unit <br />categories have not been enforced to come up beyond the 291 units. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that there is a difference between what the City is supposed to try and <br />achieve and what the City absolutely must zone for, and the City has enough in the <br />zoning. <br />Chair O'Connor stated that the City has enough in the zoning, but when it is actually <br />brought up for permitting, it is not materializing; the City is not getting the mix that it has <br />been allocated. <br />Mr. Dolan said that was correct. He stated that some of that has to do with what the <br />courts have done with the IZO, basically making inclusionary zoning for rental property <br />unenforceable so that the City is subject to a negotiation process with the applicant and <br />is subject to what the market will bear in some instances. He indicated that these <br />projects that the City has been approving are not economic homeruns for the developer, <br />and his gut tells him that some of them will not go forward. He noted that construction <br />costs are going up, and if they are not going to make enough money on these projects, <br />they will just choose not to do it. He added that he believes that will happen to some of <br />the projects. <br />Chair O'Connor asked if this will then snowball for a city like Pleasanton, where if it <br />continues to approve projects but no one is coming forth with the low- or <br />very-low- income projects, the City will always be short in that one capacity, and the City <br />will have to continually rezone more land so that it shows the possibility, but the <br />possibility never materializes. <br />Mr. Dolan said no. He indicated that the City just has to keep having the right amount of <br />zoning to meet its RHNA requirements. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 25, 2014 Page 11 of 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.