My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 042314
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 042314
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:10:51 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:08:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/23/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
because not all of those sites are going to get developed. He pointed out that there is a <br />need for housing, and here are some great sites that are in the General Plan that ought <br />to get developed and will provide housing for people who work at Workday. <br />James Paxson, Hacienda Business Park, stated that he is present mostly to speak in <br />support of over ten years of comprehensive planning through four independent planning <br />efforts that led to the current contribution of the Hacienda sites to the City's inventory in <br />the existing Housing Element. He urged the Commission to continue to keep those <br />properties in there, and in support of that, he offered five points that he thinks are really <br />worthy of the Commission's consideration: <br />During the Housing Element process when these sites were being considered, <br />they were among the most highly ranked sites in the last Housing Element cycle <br />in terms of the evaluation done on various sites. <br />2. In looking at the goals and objectives of the General Plan, particularly with regard <br />to meeting sustainability objectives, these sites meet those objectives in a way <br />that no other sites on the inventory can. <br />3. These sites have produced outstanding projects. The projects that have come <br />forward since the last Housing Element are really fantastic contributions to the <br />Pleasanton housing stock. They are projects in which the community can take <br />pride. <br />4. The fact that developers have been able to successfully bring forward projects <br />that the Commission has been able to approve is because these sites are viable <br />and will do the job of producing housing through the Housing Element. These <br />sites are uniquely qualified to help meet some of the affordability objectives that <br />were outlined for not only workforce housing but other types of affordability too. <br />These sites have unique opportunities for non - profit partnership that will not be <br />found with other inventory sites. <br />5. The infill at the Business Park is second to none. The types of infrastructure at <br />the Park, the types of benefits all housing projects will be able to access, <br />including, not the least of which is a nationally recognized commute program that <br />will be available to any resident who moves into the Park, do not come at any of <br />the other locations. <br />Mr. Paxson concluded that none of this is meant in any way to diminish the legitimate <br />concerns and critiques that come with every project brought forward. He noted that in <br />his tenure at Hacienda, projects, especially housing projects, always invite lots of <br />critique, and they should because that process helps produce better projects. He <br />thanked the Commission for its consideration and encouraged a favorable <br />recommendation to the City Council to keep the current inventory as it is. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 23, 2014 Page 20 of 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.