My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 042314
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 042314
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:10:51 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:08:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/23/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
that the City has to bend and fill its RHNA numbers; however, she absolutely is asking <br />the Commission to stick to the voters of Pleasanton and the 29,000 unit housing cap. <br />Ms. Ayala then read the following from the General Plan: "Encourage school enrollment <br />sizes that maintain neighborhood character, provide facilities, specialized programs." <br />She noted that the current target is 600 students in the elementary level, and <br />Pleasanton has upwards of 800 students; 1,000 students in middle school, and there <br />are 1,500 students in the three middle schools; and 2,000 students at comprehensive <br />high schools, and there are over 2,500 at each of the comprehensive high schools. She <br />pointed out that it is the Commission's task to plan the City for all its infrastructure <br />needs, including water which is a big problem, and asked that it stand to the General <br />Plan when it is rezoning properties. <br />Jeff Schroeder, Ponderosa Homes, stated that he is here representing the Lester <br />property and the CenterPointe Presbyterian Church property and would also like to <br />speak on behalf of the Shriner property, which has a General Plan designation of up to <br />two units per acre on a portion of that property. <br />Mr. Schroeder congratulated the developers of the Workday project, which is fantastic <br />and really great for the City. He indicated that Ponderosa is a tenant there and that it <br />has changed a lot in the last two years; for example, the parking lot was empty when <br />they moved in, and it is now full, which is wonderful and shows the unknowns and <br />uncertainties that can happen in the process. He noted that obviously, in the previous <br />Housing Element update, no one knew Workday was going to come in, take over and <br />buy 550,000 square feet of space already there and build another million square feet, <br />which is great for this community. <br />Mr. Schroeder stated that one of the reasons the RHNA numbers dropped was the <br />economy. He noted that the process that was gone through to prepare those numbers <br />is not done by the real world but by people serving in an ivory tower with some input <br />from the real world. He indicated that the numbers that they come up with assume that <br />everybody is going to live in high rises in Oakland and San Francisco, and clearly this is <br />not going to happen. He added that they will need to live somewhere, and even if they <br />do live in high rises in San Francisco, when they have children, they're going to want to <br />live in Pleasanton, Danville, or San Ramon, and there is not enough housing. He noted <br />that there are uncertainties, and some of the sites for the 2,067 housing units will never <br />get built. He pointed out that the City is down 238 units on the above- market level, and <br />that is what he is representing tonight. He noted that there is still a demand for that, <br />and the market prices are up 20 percent in almost two straight years. He indicated that <br />this is back to where the City was, but it is not healthy or good for the City to keep going <br />like that because it will not be able to continue to attract jobs that make this City healthy. <br />He stated that he thinks the best thing for the Commission to consider in this process is <br />maintaining flexibility. He added that one of the reasons property owners and <br />developers are here tonight is because they are concerned that if these properties are <br />not on the list, there is a prejudice against them of becoming rezoned over the next <br />Housing Element period. He encouraged the Commission to give itself some flexibility <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 23, 2014 Page 19 of 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.