My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 042314
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 042314
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:10:51 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:08:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/23/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Julie Testa stated that she has been here twice in the last year — during the process of <br />the last Housing Element and again more recently — and this is the third time she is <br />attending to remind the Commission, as she has tried to remind the Council, that with <br />Pleasanton schools currently impacted, every campus is beyond capacity as identified <br />in the General Plan, with significant percentages of overcrowding. She indicated that <br />the School District's finances are completely distressed, and there is no ability to build <br />more capacity or more schools. She pointed out that every unit that is rezoned and <br />approved will allow and bring children to the schools, and this violates the General Plan <br />and erodes the quality of life at the schools. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Commissioner Pearce requested clarification that, given the RHNA numbers and <br />housing inventory, the City does not actually need to rezone anything for the next RHNA <br />cycle. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that was correct. He noted that a statement was made that the City is <br />short in the above - moderate category, but the higher density zoning can be used to <br />count towards that. <br />Commissioner Allen inquired, following up on one speaker and to clarify numbers in her <br />mind regarding the housing cap the City had and where it is today, how many units <br />would the City have if all the units on the table were built and if the East Pleasanton <br />Specific Plan Preferred Plan was also built. She stated that from the March 4, 2014 City <br />Council meeting, she counted about 26,500 units; adding the 3,312 units from the table <br />would give 29,812 units; and topping that with the East Pleasanton Preferred Plan <br />potential of 1,700 units would total 31,512 units. She inquired if the count is roughly <br />right, noting that not all the units will necessarily be built. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that was correct. <br />Commissioner Allen stated that the City does not have a housing cap of 29,000 <br />because that was overturned. She noted, however, that she thinks the Commission <br />needs to just keep that in mind because she has heard the City Council and many <br />people say that the City wants to try and live the spirit of what the voters and citizens <br />were interested in when that came through, and the City was abiding by State law. <br />Commissioner Ritter stated that he listened to all the numbers and still liked the <br />comment made by a speaker that the City needs to be flexible, that it was smart <br />planning. He indicated that he does not know if the City always needs to do it just <br />because they are RHNA numbers. He noted that workforce housing is how he got into <br />Pleasanton, starting at Springtown Apartments and then moving to Stoneridge <br />Apartments, then buying a house in Pleasanton, and now he's still in Pleasanton. He <br />stated that he thinks the City gets caught up with the numbers, and it just needs to <br />make sure to do the right thing for each of these properties so the children of today's <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 23, 2014 Page 21 of 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.