My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 031214
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 031214
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:09:31 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:05:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/12/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
No action was taken. <br />7. MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br />8. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW /ACTION /INFORMATION <br />a. Future Planning Calendar <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br />b. Actions of the City Council <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br />c. Actions of the Zoning Administrator <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br />d. Matters for Commission's Information <br />East Pleasanton Specific Plan Task Force Meeting <br />Commissioner Pearce stated that the East Pleasanton Specific Plan Task Force met <br />last week and received an update on the City Council's direction. She noted that the <br />Task Force also received the Preliminary Draft Specific Plan and added that the Task <br />Force contemplated adding another EIR alternative which included no multi - family <br />housing, but ended up not doing that. She indicated that the Task Force will have one <br />more meeting in April; they ought to get the economic analysis and the draft EIR, and <br />then disperse for a little while to have community and neighborhood meetings. <br />Mr. Dolan stated that staff has had several internal meetings since the Task Force <br />meeting and have had a few more days to digest the feedback that they got from the <br />City Council. He noted that while he does not know that staff has figured out exactly <br />how this will be done or at which particular meeting, they are definitely going to ask the <br />Task Force to help staff explore some options that are not as RHNA- driven, although <br />the reality is that the current ones are not that RHNA- driven because even though staff <br />kept asking the Task Force to consider some higher- density options, ultimately the <br />majority of the alternatives include single - family versus multi - family, and the same ratios <br />in the rest of the City are very close. He noted, however, that there is no pressure in the <br />shorter term to have the high density, so staff will be looking at options and figuring out <br />or asking the Task Force to help staff fold them in. He added that staff does not have it <br />all worked out yet, but the Task Force members will probably be getting more work than <br />they thought when the members left the meeting the other night. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 12, 2014 Page 22 of 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.