My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 031214
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
PC 031214
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:09:31 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:05:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/12/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Posson stated that he also likes what they have done but believes that <br />they should incorporate staff's recommended measures for the CAP. He indicated that <br />with respect to the issue of reclaimed water and rain water, they need to look at its <br />economic feasibility and incorporate it where they can. <br />F. What other information would the Planning Commission wish to see to assist <br />its decision on the proposals (i.e., color and material board, <br />photosimulations, etc.)? <br />Commissioner Pearce stated that she normally asks for all kinds of things, but there is <br />not a lot she needs to see here. She noted that a material board is always nice, and <br />assuming they will provide one for Council, she would like them to provide one for the <br />Commission as well. She added that otherwise, she thought the packet was great and <br />the materials thus far are super. <br />Commissioner Allen concurred all the way and that a material board would be all she <br />needed. <br />Chair Olson stated that he is fine and wants to just also indicate that he agrees with the <br />speaker who talked about speeding on Kottinger Drive. He indicated that his wife and <br />he walk that road quite a bit, and it is a speedway. He stated that he was concerned <br />when he saw the package and saw that there was going to be a crosswalk right there. <br />He stated that he does not know what we can do about it, that it would probably be too <br />expensive to put an underground passage -way there. He added that he believes doing <br />something about speeding on that road is the City's problem rather than MidPen <br />Housing's. He further added that he shares the concern that this has been in the <br />making for ten years and encouraged the City to get this done. <br />Commissioner O'Connor noted that there were a few things that were mentioned in <br />Discussion Points A through E which the developer can take a quick look. He agreed <br />that ten years is long enough and this needs to move on. He indicated that they have <br />looked at all of these items, there are still a few that were brought up tonight; but they <br />have done the best job they can, and it is time to move on. <br />Commissioner Ritter stated that the only thing he would like to see next time it comes to <br />the Commission is a target completion date. <br />Commissioner Posson stated that he also thought it was a good package and agreed <br />with Chair Olson about looking at other alternatives in crossing Kottinger Drive because <br />the elderly population that will be crossing there will be increasing. He stated that he <br />also agrees that it is a City issue and not just the developer's. <br />Chair Olson asked staff if they have any other questions <br />Ms. Stern replied that staff has everything they need. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 12, 2014 Page 21 of 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.