PC 031214 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner O'Connor asked Mr. Dolan if anyone is thinking around the terms of planning the area, that if it is not constructed before the City receives its additional RHNA numbers that it needs to provide, that if the construction did not take place until after or close to 2022 and the City then found out that it did have a need for more high density, if those units could be added then; or is the City thinking of actually constructing something sooner than that and eliminating that possibility. Mr. Dolan replied that he thinks it is a possibility, but the City is just not there yet because the economic analysis has not yet been done. He stated that it could be changed at the end if it was decided that the units are needed and people have thrown out the concept of holding something in reserve. He noted, however, that enough CEQA should be done to anticipate something worse, and this has to be kept in mind or there can be trouble later. He indicated that he does not think the City Council has dismissed the idea of holding something in reserve. He added that when the Councilmembers voted to move forward, they made it pretty clear that they did not need to talk about a particular phasing or reserve plan because they just felt that is part of moving forward. He stated that that still can happen, but the City is just not there yet to make those decisions. Commissioner Pearce stated that there will be another meeting in April and that it is really going to be great. Mr. Dolan added that staff also has their work cut out for picking the right day. He noted that it is not completely out of the question for a number of reasons that April does not happen. Commissioner Allen asked if there might be a potential additional option that might be considered that backs the City into a number that assumes the City is never given an additional RHNA allocation and has a Growth Management plan. Commissioner Pearce commented that she thinks the Commission needs to be cognizant about not talking about the substance, given that this is not agendized. Commissioner Allen stated that she is totally fine and that she can talk to Brian later. e. Matters for Commission's Action (1) Request to name the private street "Rogers Lane" for the previously approved Planned Unit Development plan for a ten -lot single - family development (PUD -71) located at 3835 Vineyard Avenue. Chair Olson recused himself due to a conflict of interest. Commissioner Pearce moved to approve the private street name of "Rogers Lane" for Vesting Tentative Tract Map 7981. Commissioner Allen seconded the motion. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 12, 2014 Page 23 of 24