My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 111313
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
PC 111313
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:59:06 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:53:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/13/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Street, particularly at the AM /PM commute hours, and are concerned that the proposed <br />apartments at Bernal Avenue and Stanley Boulevard will also add to that total. He <br />continued that adding to the mix the traffic that would be coming from the EPSP <br />development would be a tremendous burden on their area, which is already highly <br />affected. He noted that they already have people who head out, going down to the <br />Southern Bay Area to work, and that those who will be living in the EPSP area would <br />certainly head over to Stanley Boulevard, and then down First Street to the freeway to <br />go to the Southern Bay Area to work. He stated that he wanted to get on the record for <br />their neighborhood that they would like this issue addressed in the EIR. <br />Karen Vifian, a PUSD employee for 16 years, stated that if there is a list of studies to be <br />done, she would like to suggest more research in determining whether the PUSD can <br />afford to operate a school even if it were built by a developer. She noted that once the <br />school is built, there still needs to be a lot of money to be spent. She indicated that the <br />past year was the first year that teachers were not given pink slips because the PUSD <br />did not have enough money to determine if these employees would be hired the <br />following year. <br />Ms. Vifian stated that she has heard of only one school being considered to be built in <br />this area. She noted that the closest middle school and high school are full, so students <br />in this area would need to be bussed or driven across town to get to school. She further <br />noted that the Alisal Elementary/ Amador High area is so congested in the mornings and <br />the afternoons and that Jensen Tract is just in gridlock such that nobody can get in or <br />out of it as it is. She pointed out that adding 30,000 more cars would certainly make a <br />difference, not only on the traffic but also in the safety of the children who are walking to <br />Alisal Elementary and Amador High, and to any other school that would be built in that <br />area. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Chair Pearce asked Mr. Dolan if the public comment period can be extended or if the <br />City is bound to the November 25 2013 date. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that it can be extended but that it would be something that he would <br />want to discuss with the City Manager to see if that would adversely impact the overall <br />schedule. <br />Chair Pearce commented that she finds the request for an extension to be a valid point <br />if people would like to have time over the Thanksgiving holiday and it does not <br />significantly adversely impact anything else, as she would like to have a little more time <br />and opportunity for the public to comment. <br />Commissioner Olson stated that one of the speakers tonight mentioned the idea of a <br />phased zoning on this project. He added that a former Councilmember /Planning <br />Commissioner sent an email with that thought in mind. He inquired if it is too late to add <br />this as an additional alternative to be evaluated. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 13, 2013 Page 10 of 50 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.