PC 111313 - Laserfiche WebLink

"vii. Evaluate not completing the El Charro extension to Stanley (avoid infrastructure costs of bypass). "viii. Evaluate effect of making El Charro 2 lanes rather than 4 lanes (decrease cut -thru traffic). "ix. Provide a detailed list of funded and scheduled City Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) that would affect the traffic analysis such as improvements along Valley Avenue (traffic improvements between Stanley and Santa Rita). z. Noise level of increased traffic. "xi. Evaluate the EIR impact of not only the proposed elementary school but also include the impact of additional traffic due to more trips for additional students to the existing intermediate and high schools. "xii. The land use designation of public facility of the City's Operations Services Center (OSC) will remain in place but will be rezoned as Public /Institutional. The traffic report should evaluate alternate permitted use in the Public /Institutional designation in its report, such as location of a private school at this location. "b. The Pleasanton School Superintendent stated in an email that this development will exceed current school capacity and that the funding from builder fees will not cover the cost of the facilities required to house the increment in students. The EIR should evaluate need for land and buildings for new schools or the need to expand current school buildings as well as the full cost of these infrastructure developments. We need to know what the cost to the community will be for the difference between builder paid fees and the true cost of these projects. "c. Since there are no discussed plans for additional middle or high school buildings, what will be the impact on school safety of the larger student body in current facilities. "d. Risk study of opening up the lakes area to the public. "e. Risk study of drowning risk for putting a school in proximity to the lakes. 7.. Impact on wildlife of this development — the lakes provide a wild -life corridor — will extension of El Charro be a barrier to wild life (foxes, deer, mountain lions, etc.). "g. Environment impact of two scenarios: "i. Zoning for full project "ii. Phased zoning to match the two RHNA phases (do not need to rezone the entire area — now to 2022 and 2022 to 2030) "h. Study the effect of traffic on quality of life from the additional 30, 000 car rides /day detailed by the preliminary traffic report. "i. Need to include Auf der Maur in all calculations as this is an approved project. `j. Ask the Planning Commission to extend the public comment period due to the holidays from November 25 to December 10 as a courtesy to the public." Brian Bourg stated that he is speaking for many of the First Street, Second Street, and Third Street neighbors who are concerned about increasing traffic beyond what is already there. He indicated that they already have extremely heavy traffic on First PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 13, 2013 Page 9 of 50