My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 071013
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
PC 071013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:48:40 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:44:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/10/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ms. Stern replied that Ponderosa's intent is to have a Parcel Map that takes it out of the <br />development such that Ponderosa does not purchase it as part of its option to develop. <br />Commissioner O'Connor inquired if the home would then be retained by the current <br />landowner. <br />Ms. Stern said yes. <br />Commissioner Allen stated that it looked like some of the trees that Mike Fulford, City <br />Landscape Engineer, is recommending to be retained were rated "3" which means they <br />are in poor condition, but "moderately" so. She inquired what the thinking was on <br />retaining them, given their condition. <br />Ms. Stern replied that she believes that given the right conditions, those trees would <br />certainly stay. She noted that it is certainly worth considering retaining some of them, if <br />possible, such as the tree that is on the creek slope, which would not be in anybody's <br />way and would not be a big problem in that location. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br />Pamela Hardy, Ponderosa Homes, Applicant, thanked staff for working with Ponderosa <br />on this project over the course of the past year. She stated that she thinks the staff <br />report provides a pretty good, detailed analysis in providing information to the <br />Commission relative to lot coverages, floor area ratios, and continuity of the project <br />within the Downtown area. She indicated that she would like to touch a little bit on the <br />background of the project; but before that, she would like to make some brief comments <br />by way of housekeeping; and then introduce the project architect, Mark Rutherford with <br />Bill Hezmalhalch and Associates; and then come back and address some of the draft <br />Conditions of Approval for some discussions. <br />Ms. Hardy stated that it was in May of last year that Ponderosa held a neighborhood <br />meeting and invited everybody on Stanley Boulevard to come to the old Wagner home <br />and take a look at our then proposed project. She indicated that they have been <br />working on this project for over a year now and had some fairly good support at that <br />time from the neighbors who wanted to see the old mobile homes removed from the <br />premises. She added that they also heard from various members of the Historic <br />Preservation Task Force who expressed concern with then proposal at that time to <br />demolish the existing house. She stated that taking away from that information, they <br />continued to refine the project and turned to the Planning Commission in November of <br />last year for a Work Session where they continued to gain guidance and direction from <br />the Commission through its thoughtful comments that helped them to refine, along with <br />the staff's comments, the site plan that Ponderosa has brought before the Commission <br />tonight. <br />Ms. Hardy continued that given the community's continuing interest in the retention and <br />preservation of the existing home, and sensing through her attendance at the Historic <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 10, 2013 Page 10 of 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.