My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 071013
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
PC 071013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:48:40 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:44:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/10/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Preservation Task Force meetings that the Task Force had a strong interest in not only <br />this house but in the preservation of other homes in the Downtown area, Ponderosa <br />went back to the seller /landowner and changed their contract to allow the owner to <br />retain the home and create a .228 -acre lot upon which that house will remain. She <br />indicated that she is not sure if the representative for the property owner will be able to <br />attend here tonight, but she thought it was safe to say that the property owner, upon <br />close of escrow once Ponderosa obtained project approval, intents to take that cash <br />flow and do some remedial work to the house to make it safe; and Ponderosa will then <br />work with the owner on some marketing or outreach to see if they can find someone <br />who would want to restore that house, either as a residence or perhaps approach the <br />City subsequently with a land use change to some other kind of transitional use in that <br />area, such as a professional office. <br />Ms. Hardy stated that she does not know at this point what will happen to the house and <br />emphasized that the house is going to remain under the ownership of the existing <br />property owner. She confirmed that staff is correct that Ponderosa will not own that <br />property and would not own the house; therefore, it is not part of Ponderosa's <br />development application, and what remains is a proposal of 12 new lots and detached <br />single - family homes, in addition to the retention of the existing house. <br />Ms. Hardy then turned the floor over to Mark Rutherford, Project Architect, to briefly go <br />over the architecture of the houses. <br />Mark Rutherford, William Hezmalhalch Architects, Project Architect, stated that he has <br />done a number of projects working with Ponderosa Homes, and typically in starting out <br />with the projects, they look at the site. He noted that this is an infill site with the <br />constraint of being perpendicular to Stanley Boulevard, and they had to look for the best <br />layout as far as providing homes that would fit within the context of having a strong curb <br />appeal that characterizes the surrounding Downtown Pleasanton. He indicated that <br />their initial direction was to do some smaller two -story homes of 2,200 to 2,600 square <br />feet with front porches on some of the homes, providing a variety within the <br />neighborhood itself, even with only two elevation styles, three floor plans with one of the <br />floor plans modified for lot 12, seven elevations and six color schemes and material <br />schemes for the 12 homes. <br />With respect to the design, Mr. Rutherford stated that they looked at other traditional <br />styles of Pleasanton and went through the Downtown Historical Guidelines, settling on <br />the craftsman style and the cottage with a variety of roof pitches to kind of distinguish <br />and give them that eclectic mix within the neighborhood: lower pitch roofs for the <br />craftsman and a higher pitch for the cottage, a variety of materials with lap siding for all <br />of the craftsman homes, lap- siding on all four sides, and stucco with stone material on <br />the cottage style. <br />Mr. Rutherford noted that a lot of the Downtown neighborhoods in Pleasanton have rear <br />garages, but because of the size of the lots and the constraints of the site, these homes <br />are going to have garages that are up front. He stated that to mitigate that, they have <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 10, 2013 Page 11 of 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.