Laserfiche WebLink
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Chair Blank noted that the Commission is not being asked to take any specific action <br />other than to provide additional feedback and comments, and commented that usually <br />that is "staff speak" for "We are not really sure you guys knew what you were doing the <br />first time around and want to give you a chance to think about it and make sure." <br />Mr. Dolan replied that hearing the Commission reiterated that it would go up to <br />35 percent is actually something that maybe he did not hear clear enough the last time. <br />He stated that he was just looking at the Minutes and noted that it was said a few times, <br />but it did not seem like the theme. He added that a reassurance that the Commission <br />would go that far is something that is useful to staff. <br />Chair Blank asked staff if they have what they need. <br />Mr. Dolan said yes, unless the Commission would consider going beyond that. <br />Commissioner Posson asked staff, if the City goes with 35 percent of multi - family in the <br />East Pleasanton Specific Plan area and then accommodate the remaining 2030 RHNA <br />needs across the City, where that would bring the mix of single - family and multi - family <br />across the City, if it would be 32 percent or 28 percent or 26 percent. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that staff has not taken the time to run the answer. He noted that it is <br />a simple calculation but that he could not tell what it would be. <br />Commissioner Posson stated that the reason he is asking that question is because the <br />Commission has heard a lot tonight and at the last public hearing about making sure <br />there is an equitable distribution of these requirements across the City. He noted that <br />the Commission came up with 35 percent, which he felt was reasonable because a new <br />area is being planned, and the RHNA numbers are coming. He stated that in his view, <br />the City should have some additional accommodation for additional multi - family housing <br />in this area, and if this is going to be equitable, then it might make sense to at least run <br />that calculation, and if it comes out to be 28 percent or 40 percent — his guess is it is <br />probably somewhere between 25 percent and 35 percent — or what that new number <br />might be, taking into consideration the 2030 RHNA needs, then that should be the <br />allocation for the East Pleasanton Specific Plan area. <br />Chair Blank stated that his understanding was basically, staff stated the last time that <br />the Pleasanton current ratio is 75 percent to 25 percent, and the Commission is willing <br />to go up to 35 percent/65 percent if it made sense. He indicated that he was trying to <br />understand what numbers Commissioner Posson wanted to run and asked if it was with <br />the general mix if the City did 35 percent in the East Pleasanton Specific Plan. <br />Commissioner Posson replied that what he is suggesting is considering the estimated <br />2030 RHNA numbers and based on the housing across the City, including the East <br />Pleasanton Specific Plan, whatever that percentage is should be the percentage of <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 12, 2013 Page 14 of 25 <br />