My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 061213
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
PC 061213
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:46:43 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:41:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/12/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
RHNA allocation, accommodated by the East Pleasanton Specific Plan. He indicated <br />that the reason he was asking is if it is 35 percent in the East Pleasanton Specific Plan, <br />and then the rest was distributed across the City, and then, the City's allocation of <br />multi - family to single - family is 28 percent, then the mix should be 28 percent/72 percent. <br />Chair Blank noted that it would certainly be the number staff should run before it goes <br />up to the City Council. <br />Commissioner Posson noted that it would then be an equitable distribution across the <br />community. <br />Chair Blank and Commissioner Olson agreed. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that he might be fine with that, depending on what <br />those numbers looked like, and he might even be fine with going up. He added that if <br />they were close, he would not have a problem with the East side having one or two <br />extra percentage points because that it is a new area, so people moving into that area <br />are going to know what that has been zoned. He continued that on the other hand, <br />going back and rezoning older, developed part of the City and adding lots of apartment <br />buildings next to existing residential communities that have been there for 20 or <br />30 years, would impact the people in these neighborhoods who do not have much <br />choice as they are already there. He then asked if the School Board has ever looked at <br />this 30 -to- the -acre type of development and figured out how many students are <br />expected to come out of that. He noted that there are not that many three - bedroom <br />homes so not a lot of families will be moving in, maybe single parents with one child or <br />two children. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that the School District has a number that it has been using which is <br />created by its consulting demographer. He noted that because the City does not have <br />any of these new apartments built at this density that the School District could sample, <br />the District is using data from existing apartments and comparing them to what the yield <br />is in Dublin and places close by. He stated that there is no perfect match and noted that <br />the yield is not high but there is a fair amount of units. He added that the District did its <br />study a few years ago, right before the City knew for sure that it was going to be losing <br />the housing cap. <br />Commissioner O'Connor recalled that the District came up with a number that was <br />somewhat less than one child per unit, on average, like a .8 or .7. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that he does not remember what the number is but it was pretty small, <br />definitely less than one child per unit. <br />Commissioner O'Connor noted that if there were 300 units total in one area, at .7 or <br />.8 child per unit, that would be 250 children or so. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 12, 2013 Page 15 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.