My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 061213
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
PC 061213
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:46:43 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:41:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/12/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
official. He recalled that the speaker brought up the possibility of densities in the order <br />of 6 to 12 units along with the 23 and 30 units mix instead of the 3, 4, and 11 mixes that <br />were part of Alternatives 1, 2, 3 and 4. He asked the Commission to look at that as well <br />and factor that into its thought process. He noted that if there are 5, 6, 8, 10 or 12 units <br />per acre rather than just 3 units, there would be a sea of 3 units per acre and then <br />towers of 23 and 30 units. He indicated that it does not need to be like that, and maybe <br />that kind of variability would be in order. He stated that maybe an Alternative 5 or 6 <br />would make a little more sense, or tweak 1 and 2 to change the 4's and 3's to 6's and <br />8's and the 8's to 10's or 12's. He noted that Commissioner Pearce ran some numbers, <br />and pointed out that this has the effect of giving everybody a little more wiggle room, not <br />only in this particular part of town but in the rest of town. <br />Mr. Sowell stated that a third thing he wanted to bring up, which he mentioned at the <br />Task Force meeting, is that at the very beginning of the Task Force process, the City <br />Council did an end -run around the Task Force by ruling out in the top corner, which is <br />just inside the Airport Protection Area, the existence of any housing and instead putting <br />campus office in there. He noted that this goes back to the industrial /commercial use in <br />the southeast corner and that it may not make sense to have that zoned that way as <br />well. <br />Mary Switzer stated that she has lived in town for 41 years and has watched it grow. <br />She indicated that her biggest concern with respect to East Pleasanton is the traffic. <br />She questioned what the City is going to do about the traffic going down Stanley <br />Boulevard and if Busch Road and Boulder Street will be extended. She noted that right <br />now, when the freeway gets balled up, the people do an end -run around Stanley <br />Boulevard, down First Street or Isabel Avenue and cuts through to 1 -84. She expressed <br />concern that there is the freeway in and out traffic, and the City is talking about some <br />pretty high densities. She added that putting in apartments means a lot of cars in a <br />small area, and all those cars have to get to the grocery store, to school, and to the <br />Downtown. She stated that she also heard that there is going to be a couple of hundred <br />apartment units on the corner where Bernal Avenue cuts across Stanley Boulevard, and <br />if that is true, the resulting traffic should be considered. <br />John Jay stated that he lives in southeast Pleasanton and moved here for the character <br />of the City. He indicated that he loved the City back then and was concerned about the <br />direction that it is headed toward today. He stated that the biggest concern that he has <br />is the possibility of crime. He noted that he has been a prosecutor for 35 years, tried <br />murder cases for 15 years and has run offices for about 11 years. He added that he <br />sees patterns, and, unfortunately, one of those patterns is the relationship between <br />low- income housing and crime. He inquired if, at this point, it is beyond requesting <br />some sort of Environmental Impact Report or Economic Impact Report when <br />low- income housing is interjected in other areas. He stated that he heard the <br />Commission's ratio is 75 to 25 and that it is being increased to 35 and 65. He asked the <br />Commission to be cautious of the impact that is going to occur with the interjection of <br />low- income homes. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 12, 2013 Page 13 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.