My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 032713
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
PC 032713
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:38:29 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:31:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/27/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
With respect to affordable housing, Chair Blank stated that his personal view is that the <br />Commission forward this to the City Council and indicate that it needs to come up with <br />policy because otherwise, the five members of the Housing Commissioner who are <br />trying to put their heads together do not have rules to go by. He compared it to the <br />Planning Commission's discussion regarding the ridge. He emphasized that this needs <br />to be defined and get certainty involved so that when developers come forward, they <br />have a policy on affordable housing to go by. As for the Citizens for a Caring <br />Community (CCC) not being involved, Chair Blank stated that the Planning Commission <br />had a Work Session on this project in October 2012. He noted that CCC is a <br />stakeholder in this and has to be involved. <br />Chair Blank indicated that this project has his support personally and that having the <br />Director of Community Development work with the applicant between now and the <br />Council meeting on some of these issues discussed earlier is a great way to move this <br />forward. <br />Commissioner Pearce indicated that she will make two separate motions: one for the <br />application, and a second to recommend that the City Council provide policy direction to <br />the Housing Commission regarding affordable housing. <br />Commissioner Pearce moved to find that the conditions described in CEQA <br />Guidelines Section 15162 have not occurred as described in the addendum to the <br />SEIR and that the previously prepared SEIR, including the adopted CEQA <br />findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Addendum to the <br />SEIR are adequate to serve as the environmental document for this project and <br />satisfy all the requirements of CEQA; that the proposed PUD Development Plan <br />and Development Agreement are consistent with the General Plan; and that the <br />exceptions to the Housing Site Development Standards and Design Guidelines as <br />listed in the staff report are appropriate; to make the PUD findings for the <br />proposed Development Plan as listed in the staff report; and to recommend <br />approval to the City Council of Case PUD- 85 -08 -01 D -04M , Major Modification and <br />Development Plan, subject to Conditions of Approval listed in Exhibit A of the <br />staff report, and of Case P13 -0030, a Development Agreement for the project, with <br />the following modifications: <br />PUD Maior Modification and Development Plan: <br />1. Add the phrase "or as otherwise approved by the Director of <br />Community Development" to Condition No. 40 regarding stockpiling of <br />dirt; Condition No. 55 regarding developing and implementing a <br />program for reclaimed water, grey water, and /or rainwater harvesting <br />systems; and Condition No. 88 regarding incorporating Universal <br />Design into the apartment units. <br />2. Modify Condition No. 64 to indicate that Energy Star appliances shall be <br />used if available. <br />3. Modify Condition No. 71 to require sub - meters. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 27, 2013 Page 45 of 48 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.