Laserfiche WebLink
complimented. He added that they can maybe get some more points, but he does not <br />want to engineer that and say that they have to go all the way with the solar. <br />Commissioner Olson stated that one of the problems he has relative to affordable <br />housing is that he spent his career in finance, and he does not know how this gets <br />financed. He added that he thinks expecting the developer to do it is not right, keeping <br />in mind that the judge had indicated that these projects have to be economically viable, <br />which means that the developer has to make a profit. He noted that if the City wants <br />more affordable housing, it needs to address how it should be financed and not just <br />telling developers that they have to do it. He stated that he thinks the Housing <br />Commission should be spending a lot of time on how to get financing for these projects. <br />He added that he senses there is a pull of one option versus another, such that the <br />more units are thrown in there, the more impact there would be on the economic <br />viability of the project. He noted that this community is a high -cost housing community <br />and has been that way for a while. He indicated that he supports this project and <br />recommends that it be forwarded to the City Council. <br />Chair Blank indicated that he would re -open the public hearing to ask the developer or <br />their representative to come forward and address Commissioner Posson's question <br />regarding what their incentive would be to install solar panels on residential rental units <br />five years down the road if they are not required to do so at this point. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS RE- OPENED. <br />Mr. Regonini explained that because a multi - family community has a limited amount of <br />roof space relative to the number of homes within a building, the photovoltaics that are <br />typically put on a roof serve the community common areas and the electrical lighting <br />around the site rather than the individual homes themselves. He stated that it would be <br />very difficult to have an inverter and the whole system built in for each and every <br />individual home. He noted that at a certain point when it does become economical or <br />viable and there is a reasonable payback and some cost - saving benefits to the overall <br />property, particularly since, as Commissioner Olson mentioned, the prices are dropping <br />and will continue to drop, it definitely does make sense for the developer to go ahead <br />and install that. He added that it can be combined with some tax credits and some <br />other incentives that are available through the utilities, and an appropriate business <br />decision can be made then to put that in. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Chair Blank stated that he likes the project, and, like Commissioner Olson, he does not <br />like mustard - yellow, but he does not feel strongly enough that he would vote against the <br />project just on the basis of that color. He indicated that he thinks it is a great project <br />and appreciated that the applicant really took into account some of the things discussed <br />at the Work Session. He added that he appreciated the efforts on the Plaza, which was <br />an impossible task, but the applicant came up with some interesting ideas. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 27, 2013 Page 44 of 48 <br />