PC 032713 - Laserfiche WebLink

4. Replace Condition No. 93 with the agreement being crafted between the applicant and the Pleasanton Unified School District regarding payment of school impact and supplemental mitigation fees. 5. Modify Condition No. 100 to indicate that reclaimed water shall be used when available. Development Agreement: 1. Section 3.05.School Fees shall be replaced by the above - mentioned agreement between the applicant and the Pleasanton Unified School District. 2. Revise the applicable section of the Development Agreement if it is determined that the applicant is eligible for the NPID rate for the traffic fee. Commissioner Narum seconded the motion. Regarding the solar matter and Title 24 requirements, Commissioner Narum inquired if the Commission would let the applicant go ahead with the 100 points. Commissioner Pearce indicated that she would like to leave it as is for now and that she would be willing to have a larger policy conversation if the Commission desires, but in the future and not with regard to this application. Chair Blank stated that he had not thought about what Commissioner Posson mentioned and what the developer said, and so he is glad the Commission went through this process. He noted that it was very valuable for him. Commissioner Pearce agreed and added that she also learned something new. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Blank, Narum, O'Connor, Olson, and Pearce. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. RECUSED: None. ABSENT: None. Resolutions Nos. PC- 2013 -16 recommending approval of Case PUD -08 -01 D -04M and PC- 2013 -17 recommending approval of P13 -0030 were entered and adopted as motioned. Chair Blank asked staff if, from a process perspective and because it is not on the Agenda, the Commission needs to vote to agendize the following motion or if the Commission can just go ahead and do it. Mr. Dolan replied that the Commission can go ahead and just do it. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 27, 2013 Page 46 of 48