My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 032713
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
PC 032713
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:38:29 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:31:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/27/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Chair Blank stated that he assumes if there is no agreement, legal staff will figure out <br />whether or not that condition should be there, considering that it cannot be there illegally <br />as Mr. Inderbitzen is suggesting. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that is correct. <br />Commissioner Posson noted that Condition No. 60 talks about allowing the future <br />installation of photovoltaic (PV) and solar water heating systems, adding that the <br />apartment buildings are going to be wired in order to meet Title 24 requirements. He <br />inquired why the solar panels not be installed now. <br />Todd Regonini, Sares Regis Group, Project Manager for this development community, <br />stated that the project will have to comply with the Green Points checklist, and an initial <br />run - through with that checklist shows that the project is approaching 100 points, far in <br />excess of the minimum that is required; therefore, there is no actual need to put the <br />PV's in right now from the standpoint of sustainability standards. He added that they <br />would be happy to look at this later on if it makes sense from an operational standpoint. <br />Chair Blank provided some background information for Commissioner Posson and <br />stated that the Commission has been putting this pre- wiring condition in for projects <br />probably for seven or eight years now. <br />Commissioner Posson replied that he is familiar with that background but noted that <br />Program 6.3 of the General Plan Energy Element talks about requiring Green Building <br />practices to be used in all projects including those not covered by mandatory Green <br />Building ordinances if feasible. He questioned why a retrofit later on would be more <br />economical for the developer than putting those in now. <br />Mr. Regonini replied that if the structure is designed to support any panels at some point <br />in the future and if the conduits necessary are installed, the actual PV installation at <br />some point in the future is really not that difficult and would just be a simple economic <br />question then. <br />Commissioner Posson asked Mr. Regonini if they would you accept a condition <br />requiring installation of the PV panels at this point. <br />Mr. Regonini said no. <br />Commissioner Posson noted that Condition No. 61 states that energy- efficient lighting <br />would be installed for the retail buildings and inquired what their intent was for the other <br />elements of the project. <br />Mr. Regonini replied that they would be looking at clearly meeting or exceeding Title 24 <br />standards and that they have not yet begun to do any analyses on Title 24 to see what <br />type of lighting would be appropriate. He indicated that it makes sense to have as much <br />energy- efficient lighting as possible. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 27, 2013 Page 34 of 48 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.