Laserfiche WebLink
project goes to the City Council regarding what those fees would be, and they would like <br />to substitute that agreement for this condition. <br />Development Agreement: <br />Section 3.05.School Fees — this is the same as the PUSD condition of approval. <br />They would expect that to be modified by the time the project gets to the City <br />Council. <br />2. Section 3.03.Traffic Mitigation Measures: Traffic Impact Fees — This project is in the <br />North Pleasanton Improvement District (NPID), and reference is made to paying a <br />non -NPID fee. They would like the ability to do an accounting exercise and verify <br />what that fee is and how much has to go back if, in any, because this property has <br />changed ownership a couple of times since that credit got accounted for. <br />Chair Blank stated that he may have misunderstood the clarification regarding the <br />universal design and asked Mr. Inderbitzen if what he mentioned was that they were <br />fine with a visual doorbell unit but not with an audible one. <br />Commissioner Narum corrected that it is the other way around; they want the audible <br />and not the visual. <br />Mr. Inderbitzen replied that was correct. <br />Mr. Dolan stated that staff has had some dialogue on all of these conditions and that he <br />would be happy to continue that dialogue with the applicant. He suggested that, if the <br />Commission wishes, the phrase "or as otherwise approved by the Director of <br />Community Development' could be added to the conditions, as written, and the <br />Commission would not need to go through the details of the conditions. <br />Mr. Inderbitzen indicated this would be fine and that they could work it out between now <br />and when it goes before the City Council. <br />Commissioner Pearce thanked Mr. Dolan and asked if he is suggesting this simply for <br />Condition No. 88 or for Conditions Nos. 55 and 40 as well. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that it would be for all the conditions. <br />Commissioner Pearce inquired if that would also include the PUSD condition. <br />Mr. Dolan noted that Mr. Inderbitzen made a specific suggestion that this condition be <br />ultimately replaced by the agreement and that staff does not oppose that as part of the <br />Commission's recommendation. He added that if the applicant has an agreement with <br />PUSD, the condition would be moot. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 27, 2013 Page 33 of 48 <br />