PC 032713 - Laserfiche WebLink

bringing this project forward. He noted that while they have had their differences, there was a pretty common vision for what ought to happen on this site, and he is proud to say that from the first presentation out of the box, the owner team put together something that was really fitting and appropriate for this site. He further noted that City staff had a number of issues that they wanted the project team to address, which were done along the way, and he believes the team has brought a really good project to the City that provides mutual benefit for both the City and for the owner. Mr. Inderbitzen presented the history of the project, noting that this was actually initiated by the owner as an application to expand the office uses on this site with three new office buildings measuring a total of about 500,000 square feet and a small hotel. He indicated that this occurred at about the time the City was going through a transit - oriented development (TOD) process in North Pleasanton, and this site was right on the edge of what would have been included with the TOD development. He continued that at that time, the City had a housing cap, so it made good sense for this site to go on an office campus path. He added that during that process, however, the City had a change in its housing cap, and the City then initiated its Housing Element Update process. Mr. Inderbitzen stated that it was at this time that an opportunity arose for this site to look at residential on that portion where one of the office buildings and the hotel would have been located. He indicated that they then started to work with City staff and the Task Force to put something together that would make sense on this site. He noted that this was one of the nine successful sites to be rezoned for high- density residential projects. He further noted that most of the other sites were rezoned at 30 units to the acre, but this site was asked to take some additional density because the site could take it, in addition to the fact that it is a good location for having 35 units to the acre as a minimum. He indicated that he thinks this is the only site throughout that rezoning process that had virtually no negative public reaction; the project essentially had no neighborhood opposition, and this is a testimony to the fact that it is in a good location, it really does function pretty much like a TOD being just barely outside a half mile from the BART station, and it just fits; the project team did a good job of fitting it in there. Mr. Inderbitzen then outlined the process for their presentation, stating that the project team's intention tonight is not to go through the project presentation in detail as they did that at the Planning Commission Work Session just four months ago and the project has not changed that substantially, but to hit the high points just to get it on the record and make sure that they have a good overview of the site. He indicated that Padru Kang would make that presentation; followed by Brett Leon, who will review the Commission's comments, questions, and input from the Work Session and show how the team responded to those, and explain why they did not respond to some and what they would like to see happen on those items. He stated that he will then come back to get a few things on the record and to update some of the issues that were not discussed at the Work Session and have arisen as they have gone forward. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 27, 2013 Page 28 of 48