My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 032713
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
PC 032713
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:38:29 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:31:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/27/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Otto replied that he believes the "semi- public" can also be used by the office tenants <br />in addition to the residents, and deferred to the applicant to clarify the difference. <br />Commissioner Posson requested clarification on the implications of the Housing <br />Commission not taking action on the affordable units. He inquired if, procedurally, the <br />Planning Commission can take action on the project even if the affordable units are not <br />defined. <br />For the benefit of Commissioner Posson, who is new to the Commission, as well as for <br />that of the public, Chair Blank requested staff to review the responsibility of the Housing <br />Commission vis -a -vis its approvals or non - approvals, and the issues that affect the <br />Planning Commission. <br />Brian Dolan explained that the Housing Commission and Planning Commission <br />processes typically run simultaneously and are tracked together, and most of the time <br />the Housing Commission hearing occurs before the Planning Commission hearing, as <br />was the case for this project. He added that the Housing Commission is charged with <br />making a recommendation to the City Council with respect to the Affordable Housing <br />Agreement between the City and the project owner /developer; however, for this project, <br />there was no resolution at the Housing Commission to make that recommendation, and <br />so it will move on to the City Council as such. <br />Mr. Dolan continued that the Planning Commission has never been asked to make any <br />recommendation on Affordable Housing Agreements, and staff would typically bring it <br />forward to the Commission in the staff report only as a point of information. <br />In summary, Mr. Dolan stated that the Housing Commission has its own process, in the <br />same way that the Planning Commission goes through its own; both Commissions deal <br />with the matters within their purviews and then give side -by -side recommendations on <br />those matters to the City Council. He added that the Housing Commission would not <br />wait for the Planning Commission to determine, for example, the building height, before <br />doings its work; and similarly, the Planning Commission should do its work and go <br />through its process independently of the Housing Commission's process. <br />Commissioner Posson thanked Mr. Dolan for the clarification. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br />Marty Inderbitzen, representing the owner, Pleasant Partners, stated that the project's <br />entire team is present tonight, including Mike Walker on behalf of the owner; Brett Leon <br />and Todd Regonini with Sares- Regis, Project Managers; Padru Kang and John Thatch <br />with Dahlin Architecture and Planning, Project Architects; David Gates and Paul <br />Stevens with Gates + Associates, Landscape Architects; Brock Roby with BKF <br />Engineers, Project Engineer; and David Gold from Morrison and Foerster, CEQA Legal <br />Counsel. He thanked staff on behalf of the entire team, noting that Mr. Dolan and <br />Mr. Otto have shown great leadership and worked with the team for quite a while now in <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 27, 2013 Page 27 of 48 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.