PC 012313 - Laserfiche WebLink

become Pleasanton Municipal Code) the Draft Municipal Code Amendment, P12 -1796, Ridgeline and Hillside Protection and Preservation, 112312013, Chapter 18.70, Item E -3. It is important to note that Chapter 18.70, is inconsistent with the meeting minutes from the Special City Council Meeting that was held on November 27, 2012. An email outlining these discrepancies was sent from Amy Loughlin (a fellow member of the Ventana Hills Steering Committee) to Brian Dolan and Marion Pavan on 1121113, and Mr. Pavan indicated that a copy of Amy's message would be sent to the Planning Commission prior to this meeting. Please take the time to review that email (if you haven't already) so that you can better understand how this verbiage has been embellished to include a far broader interpretation than the minutes show from the November 27, 2012 Special City Council Meeting. "3. My third point was also referenced in the email from Amy. We asked the City for clarification relative to `what other specific properties besides Lund Ranch 11, if any, or potential PUDs within Pleasanton could be affected (if developed in the future) by Chapter 18.70.' 1 do not believe that we have received an acceptable response from the City as of yet, and we would appreciate one. To us it appears, that the wording in the Draft Municipal Code Amendment, P12 -1796, dated 112312013, Chapter 18.70, Item E.3 has been written specifically to enable the City and Greenbriar Homes to ignore and disregard PUDs and Specific Plans written prior to November 2008. This seems to be the case since we are not aware of any future PUDs where Specific Plans or PUDs approved prior to November, 2008 regarding Public and Private Streets and Roads would be affected (other than Lund II). Greenbriar wants to route all traffic from the proposed Lund 11 development through the Ventana and Mission Hills neighborhoods via Lund Ranch Road, Independence Drive, and Junipero. This traffic flow proposal from the builder is unacceptable and it is not in line with ten prior agreements and understandings (also previously shared and discussed with Mr. Dolan and Mr. Pavan) with regard to the Lund Ranch 11 development connecting to Sycamore Creek Way (the East/West collector). `if you have not seen the email from Amy and /or the ten documents referenced regarding the Lund 11 traffic flow, we would be happy to forward them to you. "Thank you." Justin Brown, a resident in the Mission Hills neighborhood, stated that he was not a member of the Ventana Hills Steering Committee but has been in coordination with its members and represents some of the interests of people living on Junipero Street. He indicated that they fully echo the same sentiments just expressed by Ms. Spain. He stated that Item E -3 in many ways undermines the intent of Item E -1 to preserve and capitalize on the investments and decisions made in the past. He noted that a lot of money, time, effort has been spent in building road infrastructure and other investments in order to move the community forward, and giving an out in exception E -3 essentially PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 23, 2013 Page 14 of 44