My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 111412
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
PC 111412
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:18:43 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 3:07:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/14/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
making it like a weekend night, was concerning to these families who cannot speak for <br />themselves, who would not attend Commission meetings, would not call the police, and <br />would probably just deal with it. <br />Ms. Bourg also expressed concern about enforcement and how it will perhaps require a <br />lot of citizen complaints before being enforced. She stated that she has heard of things <br />like this from residents in the Barone's neighborhood and how difficult it would be in <br />terms of Police enforcement. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Acting Chair Blank commented that there is an old saying that if you have one clock in <br />your house you always know what time it is, but as soon as you bring two clocks to the <br />house, there is always a dispute. He expressed concern about having more than one <br />arbiter of what the sound levels are. <br />Commissioner Pearce inquired if, during the Task Force meetings, there were <br />discussions about requirements for businesses to periodically or on a regular basis <br />self- monitor their noise levels. <br />Ms. Ott said no; that was generally not part of the Task Force discussions. She noted <br />that the Task Force did not talk about monitoring and self- monitoring in any extent. <br />Ms. Giffin stated that during one of the meetings, Alan Rosen, the noise consultant, did <br />present it in a case study for a business in Colorado. She added that the consultant is <br />present and can speak about it. <br />Mr. Rosen stated that the project in question was in Golden, Colorado and similarly in a <br />Downtown area. He indicated that the City had adopted some standards and worked <br />with the club owner to install a system that actually allowed the band as they were <br />playing to see a light display with red, yellow, and green colors, similar to a stop light. <br />He explained that a microphone sound level meter was connected to this light array: <br />when the light was green, they were fine; the yellow light was set a few levels below the <br />standard or the threshold level, and as they played louder and the yellow light came on, <br />they knew they had to be cautious; and as soon as the red light turned on, they knew <br />they were violating the standard. He added that he did not believe that was the actual <br />device used to state whether or not they violated the standard, but it was pretty helpful <br />as a kind of way to keep them under control and help the Police, who could actually <br />drive by and take a quick look and see what color was displayed. <br />Commissioner Pearce inquired if this has been effective in that community. <br />Mr. Rosen replied that he believed it was. <br />Ms. Ott noted that any Task Force conversations about whether or not to include <br />monitoring in the Guidelines were done in the context of Mr. Rosen's presentation. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 14, 2012 Page 11 of 31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.