My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 031412
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
PC 031412
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 2:38:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/14/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commission Blank moved to find that the projects would not have a significant <br />effect of the environment and that the exceptions to the Hacienda Transit - <br />Oriented Development (TOD) Standards and Design Guidelines as listed in the <br />staff report are appropriate for the two sites; to make that PUD findings for the <br />proposed Development Plans as listed in the staff report; and to recommend <br />approval to the City Council of (1) the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for <br />the projects, (2) the Development Agreement Amendment to extend the term of <br />the Development Agreement to five years from the date of approval of the two <br />Development Plans Cases PUD- 85- 08 -12D and PUD-81-30-86D, and to <br />, <br />incorporate approval of the development standards and design guidelines of the <br />Hacienda TOD Standards and Guidelines, Case P11 -0856, (3) Cases <br />PUD- 85- 08 -12D and PUD -81 -30 -86D Development Plans to construct two <br />mixed -use, high- density residential /commercials developments, subject to the <br />Conditions of Approval listed in Exhibit A -1 and Exhibit A -2 of the staff report. <br />Mr. Blank made a comment to the public that the Commission has seen these projects <br />extensively in two previous very detailed Workshops and that the Commission is not <br />going through these projects lightly. <br />Commissioner Pearce seconded the motion. <br />Chair Pentin requested that the changes to Exhibit A -1 and Exhibit A -2 as listed in <br />staff's memo be incorporated in the motion. <br />Commissioners Blank and Pearce accepted the amendment. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Blank, O'Connor, Olson, Pearce, and Pentin <br />NOES: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />RECUSED: None <br />ABSENT: Commissioner Narum <br />Resolutions Nos. PC- 2012 -13 recommending approval of the Mitigated Negative <br />Declaration, PC- 2012 -14 recommending approval of the Development Agreement <br />Amendment, PC- 2012 -15 recommending approval of Case PUD- 85- 08 -12D (Site 1), <br />and PC- 2012 -16 recommending approval of Case PUD -81 -30 -86D (Site 2) were <br />entered and adopted as motioned. <br />Commissioner Blank thanked BRE for going through the process and asked that it make <br />Mr. Paxson's request come true as quickly as possible. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 14, 2012 Page 9 of 35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.