Laserfiche WebLink
8. The Commission, by resolution, recorr.:e:'ds that the location of Pico Avenue be- <br />tween "Minnie Street" and Sycamore Road remain as indicated on the Proposed General <br />Plan, dated November 5, 1964, since the precise 1e_stion of this street in this <br />area on the General Plan will not affect the surrounding land uses, the relationship <br />between land uses, or the basic traffic circulation principles embodied in the <br />General Plan. If detailed changes In street location are required at a later date, <br />these changes may be accomp]iched at the time when detailed development proposals <br />are submitted, without affecting the concepts of the General Plan in this area. <br />Mr. Fales read a letter, dated February 24th, from Dr. Douglas Huntze, owner of <br />multiple dwelling units located along the rear and directly adjacent to the property <br />on the east side of First Street between Kottinger and Vineyard Avenues, opposing <br />the proposal of Commercial Zoning. <br />After considerable discussion regarding this issue, it was moved by Councilman <br />McWilliams and seconded by Councilmen Bubics, that the area on the east side of <br />First Street between Kottinger and Vineyard Avenues be designated as "held for <br />further consideration" and that a joint study session be scheduled with the Planning <br />Commission at an early date in order to discuss this matter. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Bubics, Harding, McWilliams and Mayor Long <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Councilman Cairo <br />After review and discussion on the report of the Planning Commission, it was moved <br />by Councilman McWilliams and seconded by Councilman Harding that Resolution No. 65 -34 <br />adopting the New Pleasanton Area General Plan, being an amendment to the General <br />Plan dated April 25, 1960 and covering an enlarged area, bounded by Interstate <br />Highway 580, the Pleasanton Township Boundary and Isabel Avenue, Vallicitos Road <br />(SR 84) and the Pleasanton Ridge, as proposed under date of November 5, 196., and <br />as modified by City Council action on February 23 and March 1, 1965, be adopted. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Bubics, Harding, McWilliams and Mayor Long <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Councilman Cairo <br />III Mayor Long commended the community for their efforts in helping finalize the New <br />General Plan. <br />Report of the Planning Commission re: One -year time extension from March 11,.1965 <br />for Tentative Subdivision Map, Tract No. 2595 <br />Mr. Files read the report of the Planning Commission regarding the above matter <br />which recommended that the time extension be granted. <br />It was moved by Councilman Harding and seconded by Councilman Bubics that Resolution <br />No. 65 -35, granting a time extension on Tentative Map, Tract No. 2595 Amador Estates, <br />of one year to March 11, 1966, be adopted. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Bubics, Harding, McWilliams and Mayor Long. <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Councilman Cairo <br />REPORTS OF THE CITY MANAGER <br />Review of Bids; Award of Contract Capital Improvement <br />Truckl <br />Mr. Fales stated that bids for this project were opened <br />He recommended that the low base bid of $1875.00 from G. <br />Livermore for a pick -up truck be accepted. <br />Project No. 64 -13 (Pick -up <br />at 4 :00 P.N. this date. <br />F. Dailey and Sons in <br />It was moved by Councilman McWilliams and seconded by Councilman Bubics that Res- <br />olution No. 65 -36 accepting the bid from G. E. Dailey Sons in the base amount of <br />$1,875.00 for a pick -up truck be adopted. <br />III <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmen Bubics, Harding, McWilliams Mayor Long <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Councilman Cairo <br />Lease of Additional Land; Sewage _fireatT(Int Plant <br />Mr. Fales advised the Council that the City has been in need of additional land <br />adjacent to the treatment plant for effluent disposal purposes, in order to compens- <br />ate for growth of the City, and to provide the ability to continue meeting Water <br />Polution Control Board standards. <br />Mr. Fales stated that he recently completed negotiations with Mr. R. C. Kennedy for <br />the lease of additional ].ands to be used for effluent disposal purposes. If the <br />