07 - Laserfiche WebLink

Alternative Three In this alternative one court is again located in the grass "horse shoe" shaped area between the parking lots. In this alternative the second court is located to the west of the existing court ten. This alternative is estimated to cost approximately $990,000. Pros Cons • No loss of parking • Significant demolition for second court • Courts located away from existing • Significant earthwork/grading/drainage housing improvements • Centralized location with easy access • Requires more lighting, fencing, and to tennis building tennis court pavement than other alternatives • Removes 17 trees minimum (3 Heritage Trees) • Most expensive to construct On November 10, 2016, the three alternatives were presented to the Parks and Recreation Commission for review. At the meeting, the Commission chose Alternative Three as their preferred alternative to be presented to City Council. The Commission recognized this as the most costly in terms of capital investment, but preserved parking. When assigning a value to the parking the Commission felt the cost was offset and justified the expense. On December 6, 2016, the City Council considered the Parks and Recreation Commission and reviewed three options. The Council chose Alternative One due to cost considerations and because Alternative One lost fewer parking stalls and trees than Alternative Two. It was also mentioned that the east side parking is less frequently used. DISCUSSION: Based upon the City Council direction received on December 6, 2016, biddable plans and specifications were prepared for the project. On April 8, 2017, the Two New Lighted Tennis Courts at the Tennis and Community Park project was advertised to bid. Bids were opened on May 4, 2017. The engineer's estimate based upon the final design was $847,000. The final estimate was $47,000 higher than the preliminary estimate of $800,000 presented to City Council on December 6, 2016. This was primarily due to more complications discovered regarding the main electrical service to the park and its buildings. There were two responsive bidders: Contractor Name Business Location Bid Amount Goodland Landscape Tracy $797,404 Construction, Inc. Suarez & Munoz Hayward $829,000 Construction, Inc. Page 4 of 5