My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
07
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
051617
>
07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2017 11:12:33 AM
Creation date
5/10/2017 9:22:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/16/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
07
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Staff then had a topographical survey prepared and conducted utility record research for <br /> the three "finalist" locations. The required grading, parking impacts, tree removals, storm <br /> drainage, and utility connection points for each alternative were determined utilizing this <br /> information. Preliminary plans and detailed cost estimates were prepared for all three <br /> alternatives. The three alternatives were similar in that they all considered the tennis <br /> courts to be constructed in the grass area between the two parking lots that is currently <br /> delineated by a "horseshoe" shaped sidewalk. The basic difference between the <br /> alternatives is the proposed location of the second court and how it impacts the park and <br /> parking lots. A Summary of the alternatives is below: <br /> Alternative One <br /> This alternative locates one of the tennis courts in the grass "horse shoe" shaped area <br /> between the parking lots. The second court is immediately adjacent and to the east of <br /> the first court. This alternative is estimated to cost approximately $800,000. <br /> Pros Cons <br /> • Grading is minimized • Removes 15 parking spaces from east lot <br /> (Currently 43 existing spaces in east lot) <br /> • Impact to west parking lot is limited • Removes 1 parking space from west lot <br /> (Currently 65 existing spaces in west lot) <br /> • Moderate total project cost • Removes 6 trees (1 Heritage Tree) <br /> • Courts located away from existing <br /> housing <br /> • Centralized location with easy access to <br /> tennis building <br /> Alternative Two <br /> This alternative again locates one of the tennis courts in the grass "horse shoe" shaped <br /> area between the parking lots. But in this case the second tennis court is located <br /> immediately adjacent and west of the first court. This alternative is estimated to cost <br /> approximately $760,000. <br /> Pros Cons <br /> • Grading is minimized • Removes 18 parking spaces from west lot <br /> (Currently 65 existing spaces in west lot) <br /> • Lowest total project cost • Removes 8 trees (2 Heritage Trees) <br /> • Courts located away from existing <br /> housing <br /> • Centralized location with easy access to <br /> tennis building <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.