My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
050217
>
18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2017 4:14:35 PM
Creation date
4/27/2017 10:20:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/2/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
18
Document Relationships
18 ATTACHMENT 08
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\050217
18 ATTACHMENT 09
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\050217
18 ATTACHMENT 12
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\050217
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ponderosa Homes at 6900 Valley Trails Drive <br /> Initial Study and Negative Declaration <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING <br /> The project site is not located in an area identified as having site-specific <br /> archeological, paleontological, or geologic features or resources. It is possible <br /> (although unlikely) that archaeological resources could be identified on the site <br /> during ground disturbance activities. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> a) The site is not listed by the California Office of Historic Preservation as a <br /> Historical Resource.? Therefore, there would be no impact. <br /> b-d) There are no known archaeological or paleontological sites identified on the <br /> subject site. However, there could be previously undiscovered subsurface <br /> resources present. Should potential subsurface resources or human remains <br /> be found upon excavation, all work would be required to be halted and the <br /> City immediately notified. Necessary measures, such as consulting with an <br /> archaeologist, would take place prior to construction resuming. These <br /> measures are required by State law and detailed as standard conditions of <br /> approval applied to the project. As a result, the potential impact would be a <br /> less than significant. <br /> 5.6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS <br /> Less Than <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially Impact With Less Than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant No <br /> Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br /> Would the project: <br /> a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial <br /> adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or <br /> death involving: <br /> i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as X <br /> delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo <br /> Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State <br /> Geologist for the area or based on other <br /> substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to <br /> Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication <br /> 42. <br /> ' Office of Historic Preservation. California Historical Resources <br /> <http://ohp.parks.ca.gov/ListedResources/> Accessed February 26, 2017. <br /> 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.