My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
050217
>
18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2017 4:14:35 PM
Creation date
4/27/2017 10:20:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/2/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
18
Document Relationships
18 ATTACHMENT 08
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\050217
18 ATTACHMENT 09
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\050217
18 ATTACHMENT 12
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\050217
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ponderosa Homes at 6900 Valley Trails Drive <br /> Initial Study and Negative Declaration <br /> the south and southeast. Therefore, the potential impact would be less than <br /> significant. <br /> e) The project would remove 27 trees, including one heritage tree (i.e., a tree <br /> which measures 35 feet or greater in height or which measures 55 inches or <br /> greater in circumference). The project applicant would plant 125 replacement <br /> street trees. As required by conditions of approval, should the value of the trees <br /> being planted be less than the total value of the trees removed, the applicant <br /> would be required to pay the difference in value towards the Urban Forestry <br /> Fund, based on the size of the replacement tree. Additionally, conditions of <br /> approval require physical protections and cash bonds for existing trees <br /> intended for preservation during construction, consistent with the City's Tree <br /> Preservation Ordinance. Therefore, the project would be substantially <br /> consistent with local policies or ordinances related to biological resources and <br /> this potential impact would be less than significant. <br /> f) No Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other <br /> conservation plans apply to the project site. Therefore, there would be no <br /> impact. <br /> 5.5. CULTURAL RESOURCES <br /> Less Than <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially Impact With Less Than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant No <br /> Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br /> Would the project: <br /> a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the X <br /> significance of a historical resource as defined in <br /> §15064.5? <br /> b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the X <br /> significance of an archaeological resource pursuant <br /> to §15064.5? <br /> c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique Paleontological X <br /> resource or site or unique geologic feature? <br /> d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred X <br /> outside of formal cemeteries? <br /> 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.