Laserfiche WebLink
Page 8 <br /> with the Abbie 4-H Club or any other 4-H Club. Nevertheless,it is anticipated that Abbie 4-H <br /> will remain a significant partner in the planning and operations process, particularly if the <br /> project continues to include a livestock component. <br /> The Abbie 4-H Club's interest and involvement with the project,has been the primary driver of <br /> progress in creating a community farm. However, there are other alternatives that could be <br /> pursued to meet its primary objective of gaining secured space for raising livestock and <br /> conducting various 4-H Clubs programs. As an example,most 4-H Clubs coordinate their <br /> livestock programming through the county and state fairs.As such, considering the City's <br /> proximity to the Alameda County Fairgrounds,there may be an opportunity for these two <br /> parties that could meet Abbie 4-H's needs while also benefiting the fairgrounds. While we did <br /> not explore these alternatives specifically, we advise both the City and Abbie 4-H to explore <br /> them. This exploration would most importantly include,meeting with the Alameda County <br /> Fairgrounds as part of preliminary project planning to explore joint use options.If a partnership <br /> of this type was successful resulting in a reduction or elimination of the demand for housing <br /> and raising livestock,the City would have greater flexibility in determining facility needs, <br /> uses, overall project design, and programming that may be of greater benefit to the community <br /> overall. <br /> Project Development <br /> As indicated, a number of parks with community farm features and/or agreements with local 4- <br /> H groups,have acquired the park property with existing structures. For example, Emma Prusch <br /> Farm Regional Park,Deer Hollow Farm and McClellan Preserve were all acquired with existing <br /> structures that were capable of facilitating livestock and agricultural programming. Further, <br /> because many of these parks were originally working farms,no or minimal environmental <br /> review was necessary to retain the types of property uses that have occurred over generations <br /> on the property.As such,we have not identified examples of development processes and <br /> related development cost for these projects or specific approaches for addressing storm water <br /> issues, animal waste,odor,24-hour animal security(usually through on-site caretaker), and <br /> other matters related primarily to livestock management. <br /> The Abbie 4-H Draft Master Plan does include a preliminary environmental conformance <br /> review including the fact that the conversion of existing Bernal Property farmland to urban uses <br /> would have an adverse impact on agricultural resources both for the Specific Plan and <br /> cumulatively.Further,the Abbie 4-H Draft Master Plan notes that because there is no practical <br /> mitigation of impacts on agricultural resources available consistent with the Specific Plan,the <br /> impact is significant and unavoidable,both on a project and a cumulative basis. The Abbie 4-H <br /> Draft Master Plan also notes that there are no practical mitigation measures and therefore,the <br /> impact after mitigation is significant and contributes to cumulative impacts. <br /> Notwithstanding the Specific Plan and its environmental impact review, additional review is <br /> recommended to address storm water, odor, and waste management concerns as the result of <br /> „.4);) <br />