Laserfiche WebLink
TASK 3 J eliverables: <br /> • Technical Report 1 Existing and Future Conditions (Summary of products in Task 2 and <br /> 3) <br /> ® Summary of Existing Tn-Valley Transit Services <br /> e Assessment of Strengths, Weakness, and Gaps <br /> e Pleasanton-Sunol Paratransit Ridership Performance and Operations Findings <br /> • Tn-Valley Demographic Assessment of Paratransit Riders <br /> e Demographics Assessment of Paratransit Riders by City only — Dublin, Livermore, <br /> Pleasanton, Sunol) <br /> e Ridership Forecasts <br /> e LAVTA NTD FY2016 Data Report <br /> TASK 4: PEER REVIEW <br /> Peer Review will be conducted for paratransit services provided by PPS and LAVTA <br /> ® Nelson/Nygaard will identify peers for paratransit services from a variety of providers <br /> such as Alameda County, San Mateo, San Francisco, Mann, Sonoma, and Contra Costa <br /> County Consultant shall evaluate paratransit service delivery models and policies for <br /> sister agencies in the Bay Area <br /> ® Nelson/Nygaard will work with project management team staff to define up to six <br /> different models, based on input from staff and stakeholders, that would serve as the most <br /> practical case studies for this assessment <br /> e Case Studies will provide detailed information about the following <br /> o Program structure and funding(jurisdictional responsibility) <br /> o Eligibility <br /> o Service area <br /> o Fares <br /> o Performance ridership and cost trends in comparison with fixed-route service trends <br /> o Oversight and decision making <br /> o Community involvement/resident participation <br /> o Challenges <br /> o New programs and initiatives <br /> o Marketing <br /> o Advice for PPS <br /> o Advice for LAVTA <br /> ® Agency questionnaires will be prepared to conduct peer review Questionnaires will be <br /> reviewed with the project management team staff <br /> ® Upon completion of interviews, findings will be summarized in the Peer Review Report <br /> TASK 4 Deliverables: <br /> ® Technical Report 2 Peer Review Report <br /> 11 ( Page <br />