My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
100416
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 2:23:44 PM
Creation date
9/29/2016 2:50:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/4/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
164
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Appendix C. Forecast of PG&E's Generation Rates <br /> MRW developed a forecast of PG&E's generation rates for comparison with the rates that <br /> Alameda CCA will need to charge to cover its costs of service. MRW developed the forecast for <br /> the years 2017-2030 using publicly available inputs, including cost and procurement data from <br /> PG&E, market price data, and data from California state regulatory agencies and the U.S. Energy <br /> Information Administration. The structure of the rate forecast model and the basic assumptions <br /> and inputs used are described below. <br /> Generation Charges <br /> PG&E's generation costs fall into four broad categories: (1) renewable generation costs, (2) fixed <br /> costs of non-renewable utility-owned generation, (3) fuel and purchased power costs for non- <br /> renewable generation, and(4) capacity costs. Each of these categories is evaluated separately in <br /> the rate forecast model, and underlying these forecasts is a forecast of PG&E's generation sales. <br /> Sales Forecast <br /> PG&E's generation cost forecast is driven in large part by the amount of generation that PG&E <br /> will need to obtain to meet customer demand. To forecast PG&E's electricity sales, MRW <br /> started with the 2016-2030 sales forecast that PG&E provided in its January 2016 Renewable <br /> Energy Procurement Plan ('`RPS Plan") filing with the CPUC.20 This forecast predicts 4% annual <br /> sales reductions through 2020 and anemic sales growth of 0.2%per year from 2020-2025,before <br /> increasing to close to 1%per year from 2025-2030.21 <br /> Renewable Generation <br /> The starting point for MRW's analysis is PG&E's "RPS Plan," in which PG&E discusses its plan <br /> for meeting California's Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) targets and provides the annual <br /> amount and cost of renewable generation currently under contract through 2030. PG&E's RPS <br /> Plan shows that PG&E's current renewable procurement is in excess of the RPS requirement in <br /> each year through 2022. After 2022, PG&E's renewable generation from current contracts falls <br /> below the RPS requirements,but PG&E is projected to have enough banked Renewable Energy <br /> Credits (RECs) from excess renewable procurement in prior years to meet the RPS requirements <br /> until 2025. <br /> MRW adopted PG&E's RPS Plan forecast of the amount and cost of renewable generation that is <br /> currently under contract. For the period starting in 2026 when PG&E's RPS Plan shows a need <br /> 20 Pacific Gas&Electric.Renewables Portfolio Standard 2015 Renewable Energy Procurement Plan(Final <br /> Version).January 14,2016.Appendix D. <br /> 21 The near-term decline in sales in PG&E's forecast is likely attributable to the growth in CCA,in which a <br /> municipality procures electric power on behalf of its constituents instead of having them purchase their power from <br /> PG&E.While customers in the jurisdictions of these municipalities have the option to opt-out of CCA and to <br /> continue to procure power from PG&E,so far,most CCA-eligible customers have not elected for this option.CCA <br /> customers continue to procure electricity delivery services from PG&E;it is only generation services that they <br /> obtain through the CCA. <br /> C- 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.