Laserfiche WebLink
Community Choice Aggregation Feasibility Analysis Alameda County <br /> Table 14. Stress Test Results,2017-2030 <br /> Average Rate <br /> Differential <br /> (C/kWh) <br /> Base 2.1 <br /> Stress Scenario -0.7 <br /> Figure 21 shows the difference between the PG&E customer rate and the Alameda County CCA <br /> customer rate(including exit fees) in the base case and in each of the sensitivity scenarios, for <br /> each year from 2017 to 2030. As Figure 21 illustrates, CCA customer rates are lower than PG&E <br /> customer rates in each of the individual sensitivity cases in each year and are lower that PG&E <br /> customer rates in the stress test case from 2017-2023. Beginning in 2024, CCA customer rates <br /> exceed PG&E customer rates in the stress test case(i.e., the rate differential is negative) due to <br /> the reduction in PG&E rates as Diablo Canyon is retired and replaced with lower-cost power <br /> sources. <br /> Figure 21. Difference Between PG&E Customer Rates and CCA Customer Rates Under <br /> Each Sensitivity Case, 2017-2030 <br /> 6.0 <br /> -Diablo Canyon <br /> relicensed <br /> 5.0 <br /> •••Base <br /> 4.0 <br /> •High <br /> 3.0 oft renewable <br /> • prices <br /> 2.0 N.% . High PCIA <br /> 1.0 High natural <br /> gas price <br /> 0.0 <br /> -Low PG&E <br /> 2017 2018 2019 2020 2022 4 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 portfolio costs <br /> -1.0 <br /> o ■Stress Scenario <br /> -2.0 <br /> July,2016 30 MRW&Associates,LLC <br />