Laserfiche WebLink
Community Choice Aggregation Feasibility Analysis Alameda County <br /> Higher Exit Fee (PCIA) Sensitivity <br /> PG&E's PCIA exit fees are subject to considerable uncertainty. Under the current methodology, <br /> PCIA rates can swing dramatically from one year to the next, and this methodology is currently <br /> under review and may be adjusted in the coming years. MRW therefore evaluated a stress case in <br /> which PCIA rates don't fall after 2018, as anticipated in the base case,but instead remain at 2018 <br /> levels through 2030. This increases the 2030 PCIA to 250% of its base case value. The impact of <br /> this stress case is to reduce the 2017-2030 average rate differential by 0.70/kWh relative to the <br /> base case. <br /> Table 11. Higher PCIA Exit Fee Sensitivity Results,2017-2030 <br /> Average PCIA Rate Average Rate <br /> (C/kWh) Differential <br /> (C/kWh) <br /> Base Case 1.4 2.1 <br /> Higher Exit Fees(PCIA) 2.1 1.4 <br /> Higher Natural Gas Prices Sensitivity <br /> Natural gas prices have been low and relatively steady over the last few years,but they have <br /> historically been quite volatile and subject to significant swings from local supply disruptions <br /> (e.g., Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005). MRW analyzed a gas price sensitivity case using the <br /> U.S. Energy Information Administration's High Scenario natural gas prices forecast,42 which is <br /> up to 60%higher than MRW's base case forecast in some years. Natural gas price increases <br /> affect power supply costs for both Alameda County CCA and PG&E; however, the nuclear and <br /> hydroelectric capacity in PG&E's resource mix makes PG&E less sensitive than Alameda <br /> County CCA to changes in natural gas prices. The net effect of higher natural gas prices is <br /> therefore to increase CCA rates relative to PG&E rates43 (i.e., reduce the average rate <br /> differential). Under the sensitivity conditions considered, the 2017-2030 average rate differential <br /> decreases relative to the base case by 0.90/kWh. <br /> 42 U.S. Energy Information Administration."2015 Annual Energy Outlook,"Table 13 <br /> 43 For the Scenario 3 the high gas natural prices case is favorable(i.e.,the rate differential is higher than the rate <br /> differential for the Base Case). <br /> July,2016 28 MRW&Associates,LLC <br />