My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
100416
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 2:23:44 PM
Creation date
9/29/2016 2:50:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/4/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
164
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Community Choice Aggregation Feasibility Analysis Alameda County <br /> Chapter 3: Cost and Benefit Analysis <br /> As described in the prior chapter, as part of the pro forma analysis, MRW calculated Alameda <br /> County CCA rates that would, where feasible, cover CCA costs and maintain long-term <br /> competitiveness with PG&E. This chapter uses those rates to compare the costs and benefits of <br /> the Alameda County CCA across three scenarios: (1) Renewable Compliance, (2) Accelerated <br /> RPS and(3) 80% RPS by 2021. Costs and benefits are evaluated by comparing total CCA <br /> customer rates (including PG&E exit fees) to PG&E generation rates to assess the net bill <br /> savings(costs) for customers that join the CCA. <br /> Scenario 1 (Renewable Compliance) <br /> Under Scenario 1, the Alameda County CCA meets all RPS requirements (including Senate Bill <br /> 350 requirements) and does not obtain incremental renewable power or low-carbon power in <br /> excess of these requirements. <br /> Rate Differentials <br /> Figure 14 summarizes the results of this scenario in the form of the total Alameda County CCA <br /> customer rate (vertical bars) and the comparable PG&E generation rate(line).33 Of the CCA cost <br /> elements, the greatest cost is for non-renewable generation followed by the cost for the <br /> renewable generation, which increases over the years according to the RPS standards. Another <br /> important CCA customer cost is the PCIA exit fee, which is expected to decrease in most years <br /> beginning in 2019 and to become less important over time. <br /> Under Scenario 1, the differential between PG&E generation rates and Alameda County CCA <br /> customer rates is positive in each year(i.e., CCA rates are lower than PG&E rates). As a result, <br /> Alameda County CCA customers' average generation rate (including contributions to the reserve <br /> fund)can be set at a level that is lower than PG&E's average customer generation rate in each <br /> year. The annual differential between the PG&E rate and the total CCA customer rate is expected <br /> to vary significantly over the course of this period(Figure 14). During the initial period from <br /> 2017-2023, the differential between the two rates increases (i.e., the CCA becomes more cost- <br /> competitive) due to an expected decrease in the exit fees charged to Alameda County CCA <br /> customers. Beginning in 2024,the rate differential narrows due to a decrease in PG&E <br /> generation rates stemming from the closure of the Diablo Canyon nuclear plant. After 2026, the <br /> difference between the two rates is expected to increase at a modest rate as PG&E's generation <br /> rates stabilize and exit fees decline. <br /> 33 All rates are in nominal dollars <br /> July,2016 18 MRW&Associates,LLC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.