Laserfiche WebLink
Community Choice Aggregation Feasibility Analysis Alameda County <br /> Figure 14. Scenario 1 Rate Savings, 2017-2030 <br /> 12 <br /> -- PG&E <br /> 10 <br /> 8 •PCIA <br /> •GHG <br /> 6 ■O/M <br /> 4 ■Non-Renewable <br /> ■Renewable <br /> 0 <br /> 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 <br /> Residential Bill Impacts <br /> Table 6 shows the average annual savings for Residential customers under Scenario 1. The <br /> average annual bill for the residential customer on the Alameda County CCA program will be on <br /> average 7% lower than the same bill on PG&E rates. <br /> Table 6. Scenario 1 Savings for Residential CCA Customers <br /> Monthly Bill with <br /> Bill with PG&E <br /> Residential Consumption Alameda Savings($) Savings(%) <br /> (kWh) ($) County CCA($) <br /> 2017 650 147 142 5 3% <br /> 2020 650 160 145 15 9% <br /> 2030 650 201 188 13 6% <br /> Greenhouse Gas Emissions <br /> Figure 15 shows the GHG emissions from 2017-2030 for Alameda County CCA under Scenario <br /> 1, and PG&E's expected emissions for the same load if no CCA is formed. The CCA's GHG <br /> emissions initially increase from 2017 to 2019 as the CCA is phased in across the county(from <br /> serving 33% potential county load in 2017 to 100% in 2019), and then decrease steadily in the <br /> following years as the CCA's renewable content grows pursuant to SB 350's requirements of <br /> 50% RPS by 2030. PG&E emissions are lower than those of the CCA in this scenario due to the <br /> July,2016 19 MRW&Associates,LLC <br />