My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
17
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
100416
>
17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2016 4:27:44 PM
Creation date
9/29/2016 2:39:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/4/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
17
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
plan so they can run the model to identify appropriate sites for recharge activities(via <br /> percolation and/or injection wells),estimate recharge/injection rates(annual and long-term), <br /> develop operational parameters(e.g., injection schedule),and identify potential water quality <br /> impacts. <br /> • Zone 7 staff will perform the running of the existing groundwater model. <br /> Task 5.4 Peer Review of Modeling Results <br /> • Consultant will perform peer review of modeling results performed by Zone 7 staff. <br /> Localized Analysis: <br /> The localized analysis will only be performed on the three(3)shortlisted alternatives determined in Task <br /> 4.4. <br /> Task 5.5 Site Suitability and Aquifer Recharge Rate Analysis <br /> • From the literature review(Task 5.1),COL evaluation(Task 5.2)and modeling(Task 5.3), <br /> summarize estimates of recharge rates and aquifer capacity,aquifer features affecting injection <br /> feasibility,areas potentially suitable for injection based on water supply well locations,and data <br /> gaps. <br /> • Assess injection well feasibility based on existing literature and modeling results, and <br /> recommend candidate sites for bench tests,field investigations,and/or pilot injection well. <br /> Task 5.6 Water Quality Desktop Assessment <br /> Based on literature review and historical data: <br /> • Evaluate potential for mobilization of contaminants(e.g., arsenic,chromium)in the aquifer. <br /> • Evaluate potential for precipitation and/or plugging of injection wells. <br /> • Identify potential adjustments to water chemistry of injection water to minimize adverse water <br /> quality impacts. <br /> Task 5.7 TM 5 <br /> Draft TM 5 will summarize the results of Task 5. Comments received on the Draft TM will be <br /> incorporated into the Draft Report. <br /> Task 6-Recommendations: The results from Tasks 4 and 5 will be summarized into a recommended <br /> alternative for further investigation. <br /> Task 6.1 Discussion of Recommendations <br /> • Describe recommended alternative to investigate further. <br /> • Develop list of next steps required for implementation of preferred alternatives, including <br /> environmental, permitting,modeling,funding, outreach and pilot/field testing.. <br /> • Discuss potential impacts of recommended alternatives(for example consider impacts to surface <br /> water and identify any potential means of mitigating these impacts). <br /> The recommendations will be incorporated into the Draft Report.No separate TM will be prepared. <br /> Task 7-Report and Presentations: The Draft Report will be a summary of the previously provided <br /> TMs, along with the recommendations.A short Executive Summary document(about 20 pages)will be <br /> provided for public/decision-maker use. Consultant will present at up to six Joint Liaison Committee and <br /> individual agency Boards on draft/final report,using essentially the same presentation materials. <br /> Task 7.1 Draft Report <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.