My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
17
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
100416
>
17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2016 4:27:44 PM
Creation date
9/29/2016 2:39:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/4/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
17
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Task 4.3 TM 4 <br /> Draft TM 4 will summarize Tasks 4.1-4.2. Comments received on the Draft TM will be incorporated into <br /> the Draft Report. <br /> Task 4.4 Develop Short Listed Alternatives (Conceptual Design/Cost) <br /> Using information developed in TM 4(Options)and Tasks 5.1-5.4(Hydrogeologic Feasibility),three <br /> short-listed alternatives will be developed in more detail. <br /> • Based on findings from Tasks 4.1-4.3,and Tasks 5.1-5.4 recommend a short list of options to <br /> analyze further. <br /> • Develop high-level conceptual layout of various options, including possible modification of <br /> existing wastewater treatment plants for conversion to potable reuse applications. <br /> • Develop conceptual design(siting,treatment processes, sizing,brine disposal, <br /> transmission/distribution,etc.)for the short list of options. <br /> • Assess power requirements, source options(e.g.,PG&E,renewable energy,etc.),and related <br /> infrastructure(e.g.,electrical equipment to provide additional load,etc.)for short listed <br /> alternatives. <br /> • Estimate and compare capital and operation and maintenance costs of short-listed alternatives. <br /> • Identify most promising option/s. <br /> Task 4.5 TM 6 <br /> Draft TM 6 will summarize the results of Task 4.4.Comments received on the Draft TM will be <br /> incorporated into the Draft Report. <br /> Task 5-Hydrogeologic Feasibility: <br /> Consultant will use a two-phase approach to develop options and alternatives that will be developed in <br /> parallel with Tasks 3 and 4.The first phase,Regional Modeling, consists of using the existing Zone 7 <br /> groundwater basin model to evaluate high-level feasibility of injection and/or percolation.Zone 7 staff <br /> will be responsible for running the model.The second phase, Localized Analysis,consists of a more <br /> detailed feasibility analysis of specific sites in short listed alternatives.This second phase includes <br /> evaluation of groundwater quality,potential for contaminant mobilization,and plugging potential.Task 5 <br /> is a desktop evaluation that relies on data provided by the agencies,and does not include any physical <br /> testing or drilling. <br /> Regional Modeling Efforts: <br /> The Regional Modeling effort tasks will use existing information that is available to evaluate the wide <br /> range of alternatives and screen them down to feasible options. <br /> Task 5.1 Background Information and Model Review <br /> • Review relevant data(to be provided by Tri-Valley Agencies)related to historical groundwater <br /> quality, groundwater modeling recharge/injection rates,geological studies, etc. <br /> Task 5.2 Chain of Lakes (COL)Evaluation <br /> • Assess COLs recharge feasibility based on existing literature and modeling results,recommend <br /> candidate lake/s,and recommend next steps for field investigation. <br /> Task 5.3 Groundwater Model Work Plan <br /> • Provide technical direction to Zone 7 staff on the development of a groundwater modeling work <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.