My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06 ATTACHMENT 6
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
092016
>
06 ATTACHMENT 6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 11:37:54 AM
Creation date
9/15/2016 3:50:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/20/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
06
Document Relationships
06
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\092016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
willing to condition it and I think it's enforceable. I do, so that's why I think I can go that <br />route, but in the interest of doing it, that's what I'm thinking. <br />Commissioner Allen: So the thing I'd add is Mason only and then a number of times <br />because a number of times is more enforceable. Like if we said a maximum of one per <br />month if we wanted to start off conservative or something like that. <br />Commissioner Nagler: Are you talking about the backyard? <br />Commissioner Allen: The backyard. I'm talking about the Mason's use of the backyard. <br />Commissioner Balch: Are you preserving that it's a buffer zone still? I ask because it <br />seems to be exclusive to me. <br />Commissioner Nagler: Well, that's why I'm confused when you say it's a buffer zone. Is <br />it still a buffer zone if we allow up to 10 people in the backyard? <br />Commissioner Balch: I wasn't in that majority so I'm not going to argue your case. <br />Commissioner Allen: And that's where I was. I was that it was still a buffer zone with <br />10 people that are Masons in the backyard if I was making up once per month that I'd <br />say they should have a right to have 10 people in the backyard for lunch and not at <br />9PM. <br />Commissioner Nagler: May I respond? To use your analogy which I think is an <br />excellent one because the Millers and others are arguing that we're in a neighborhood <br />and therefore it ought to be considered as if it was another neighborhood property, we <br />wouldn't think to say, resident 'x', you can only use your backyard once a month. So if <br />for example we say there could be no more than 5 people in the backyard at any one <br />time, then it sort of doesn't matter how often they are back there. <br />Commissioner Allen: I get your point. <br />Commissioner Balch: So to Commissioner O'Connor's point, if you're a strict prohibition <br />of a backyard, you've solved a lot of problems. <br />Commissioner Allen: You have. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: You've solved almost every problem because I don't even <br />think you have to have a conversation over Mason function and something commercial <br />going on if no one's using the backyard. They did commercial before and there was no <br />problem. <br />Commissioner Balch: Could I suggest a possible out? Could we do that but allow an <br />exception at the Director of Community Development? So for example, if the Masons <br />wanted to have a Mason event that staff felt was appropriate, they could petition for it <br />and it doesn't have to be a CUP amendment. <br />EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 22, 2016 Page 33 of 52 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.