My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06 ATTACHMENT 6
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
092016
>
06 ATTACHMENT 6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 11:37:54 AM
Creation date
9/15/2016 3:50:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/20/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
06
Document Relationships
06
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\092016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Allen: I'm fine with that because I do see an enforcement issue of getting <br />into these little, you know, allowing a little bit. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: If you want solid doors I don't know what the attraction's going <br />to be, but I'd hate to put someone like Gerry on the spot here tonight because the <br />people who hold his position change. We've had several since I've been here and <br />might put all of my confidence in Gerry, but what about his replacement someday — <br />sorry, but I mean I've known another Jerry, this Gerry, Brian and... <br />Commissioner Balch: But my argument would be similar to a special event permit for <br />example. I'm assuming the City has a process for evaluating special permits. <br />Beaudin: We were just talking about that. So there's a temporary use permit process. It <br />requires some lead time so if you know about the event and went through a regular <br />check and that is still approved by me, but there's an application process and it's <br />considered an event permit. <br />Commissioner Balch: So conceivably, if the Masons wanted to have an event in their <br />backyard which has a prohibition since it's a buffer but its advanced planning and <br />thought of, it could go through a process. I like that. <br />Commissioner Allen: I like that too. <br />Commissioner Nagler: So are we saying that if the Masons want to have a yoga class <br />for themselves and eight people sign up for the yoga class and they would like to have <br />the yoga class in the fresh air in the privacy of the piece of property away from the <br />street in the backyard, in the buffer zone.... <br />Commissioner Balch: They would have to get a temporary use permit. Yes, we are <br />saying that. <br />Commissioner Nagler: For an eight person yoga class? <br />Commissioner Balch: Yes. Because the premise is that it's a landscape area of some <br />sort and frankly, the condition was an accepted condition to build the building. If you <br />didn't like it, don't build the building frankly. That's my opinion. It was a stated condition. <br />This is a buffer zone originally in 1977 and they chose to build it which meant, hey, <br />you're in until you destroy the building in my opinion because you agreed by getting a <br />building permit, pulling it, getting it, finaling it and building the building. <br />Commissioner Nagler: Speaking about things changing, if it turns out by chance escrow <br />closes and there's a new owner and the owner comes to the City and says "we want to <br />tear down the buildings there; that we only did this whole thing because we want the <br />piece of the property ". We're going to tear down the building or double the size of the <br />building and the only way to double the size of the building is to go into this buffer zone, <br />are we in any way suggesting by this action that we're creating some notion that the <br />buffer zone has to be of some distance, some size? <br />Chair Ritter: It all starts over. <br />EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 22, 2016 Page 34 of 52 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.